[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1wnngxiv67oyg":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"publishedAt":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":13,"source":14,"sourceUrl":15,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":18,"affectedCount":18,"affectedCountStatus":19,"affectedCountLowerBound":12,"affectedCountUnit":20,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"contentLocale":21,"availableLocales":22,"translations":24,"severity":27,"dataClasses":28,"description":35,"seoTitle":36,"seoDescription":37,"logoUrl":38,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":39,"isSpamList":39,"isMalware":39,"company":40},"6a452308a20f867c8ba8e77c","cfgi","CFGI Data Breach","cfgi.com","2026-03-06T00:00:00.000Z","2026-06-18T03:22:51.000Z",null,"2026-07-27T16:11:12.440Z","Financial consulting corporate contact data breach","https:\u002F\u002Fdatabreach.com\u002Fbreach\u002Fcfgi-2026",[15,17],"https:\u002F\u002Fobscureiq.com\u002Fcompany\u002Fcfgi.com",248235,"known","unknown","en",[21,23],"tr",{"en":25,"tr":26},{"slug":7},{"slug":7},"High",[29,30,31,32,33,34],"Email addresses","Employers","Job titles","Names","Phone numbers","Physical addresses","\u003Cp>The CFGI data breach was confirmed on March 6, 2026, with the exposure of business communication records associated with the company providing financial advisory and corporate reporting services. The record covers 248,235 unique email accounts. The confirmed data types focus on corporate communication and business context: email addresses, employer information, job titles, names, phone numbers, and physical addresses. This incident should not be considered a password or payment card leak; however, it can provide sufficient context for convincing social engineering messages targeting individuals working in finance, accounting, reporting, and consulting.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaking Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The data types listed in this record are the fields Email addresses, Employers, Job titles, Names, Phone numbers, and Physical addresses. Together, these fields can reveal which institution a person is associated with, what position they hold, which phone number they can be reached at, and to which address they appear to be linked. Due to the financial advisory context, the risk is not limited to just receiving spam emails. Attackers can combine the company name, job title, and phone number to create fake client files, fake audit requests, fake invoice approvals, fake document sharing, or fake meeting invitations. Unverified person counts, data fields, and threat-actor claims are not treated as part of the public incident scope.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The verified main metric is 248,235 unique email accounts. In some indexes, the number of table rows may appear higher; this difference may be due to duplicate records belonging to the same person, institution-based contact rows, or field-level indexing differences. Employer and title information reinforces the corporate communication aspect of the incident; nevertheless, this record should not be presented as a full financial report, customer balance sheet, tax file, bank account, payment card, or official ID number leak. Due to the company's consulting sector, the incident carries a high risk for business email security, but verified fields are limited to personal contact and corporate profile information. This distinction should be maintained both in user notifications and internal incident assessment.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The primary group at risk includes employees, managers, consultants, finance teams, and client contact points who have worked with CFGI, made contact, or have corporate email and job information in their records. Individuals with employer and job title information may be targeted with fake executive instructions, fake client requests, or fake audit documents. Records with phone numbers allow attackers to use voice calls or text messages in addition to email, which strengthens scenarios that create pressure, such as urgent files, signatures, payment approvals, or meeting changes. Individuals with physical address information can be contacted under the pretext of mail, office delivery, or regional events. On the institutional side, roles in accounting, finance operations, reporting, audit preparation, and executive assistant positions require higher attention because these roles are naturally close to document and payment processes.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Even if the password field is unverified, password resets, fake login pages, and fake file-sharing invitations are commonly used in work email attacks. Since employer, title, and phone information are present, unexpected requests for invoices, contracts, audits, payments, payroll, or customer files should be verified through a second channel. Do not place extra trust in people who know your organization, position, or office address during phone calls; this information may have come from leaked corporate communication records. Finance and consulting teams should verify payment routing changes, bank information updates, and document sharing requests without considering written approval alone as sufficient.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Since corporate communication data can remain valid for years, such leaks pose a longer-term risk than short-term spam waves. Companies should consider even publicly visible information like employee names, titles, phone numbers, and office addresses as risky when combined with sensitive workflows. For finance and consulting teams, rules for verifying payment requests, file-sharing permissions, client document transfers, and approval processes for manager instructions should be regularly reviewed. Email forwarding for departing employees, old client lists, and unused communication accounts should be closed. Reducing unnecessary phone and address information in corporate directories ensures that similar data sets generate less value in the future.Users, on the other hand, should avoid using business and personal services with the same email address and should evaluate unexpected connections and attachments related to their business role more strictly.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>LeakData check shows whether your email address appears in the CFGI leak. A positive result does not mean that your password or financial account has been compromised; the verified risk is the misuse of corporate communication and business profile information. As a personal action, strengthen work email security, change similar passwords, verify unexpected file and payment requests through an independent channel, and do not skip identity verification steps for requests received by phone. If the same email address appears in other leaks, the risk increases; because attackers may combine the job title from the CFGI record with personal information from other leaks to create more convincing attacks.\u003C\u002Fp>","CFGI Data Breach (248.2 Thousand Reported Records)","CFGI Data Breach. 248.2 Thousand reported records are reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Employers, Job titles. Review the scope, risks, and protective…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fcfgi_com.webp",false,{"name":41,"sector":42,"country":43,"website":9,"websiteArchiveUrl":44,"websiteStatus":44,"websiteCheckedAt":12},"CFGI","Financial Services","United States",""]