[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1w23l4v3t1hf7":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"publishedAt":13,"modifiedDate":14,"contentUpdatedAt":15,"source":16,"sourceUrl":17,"sourceUrls":18,"pwnCount":19,"affectedCount":19,"affectedCountStatus":20,"affectedCountLowerBound":13,"affectedCountUnit":21,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"contentLocale":22,"availableLocales":23,"translations":25,"severity":28,"dataClasses":29,"description":35,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":36,"logoUrl":37,"isVerified":38,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":38,"isMalware":38,"company":39},"6a46941deb9a17eecbce5f47","Foro del Guardia Civil","Foro del Guardia Civil Alleged Data Exposure","foro-del-guardia-civil","forodelguardiacivil.com","2022-09-01T00:00:00.000Z","2026-07-02T16:38:53.385Z",null,"2026-09-17T16:27:41.515Z","2026-09-17T17:05:27.839Z","Third party breach","https:\u002F\u002Fforodelguardiacivil.com\u002F",[17],233063,"known","email_identifiers","en",[22,24],"tr",{"en":26,"tr":27},{"slug":9},{"slug":9},"High",[30,31,32,33,34],"Email addresses","Usernames","Password hash metadata","Password salts","Passwords","\u003Cp>The Guardia Civil Forum data breach is a user data incident associated with the forum community linked to law enforcement under the domain forodelguardiacivil.com, which is connected to the period of September 2022. This record was kept at a scale of 233,063 entries. Supported data fields were clarified as email addresses, usernames, password hash information, password salts, and password data; unsupported claims of phone numbers, addresses, payment cards, or official IDs were not added to the data categories to avoid misleading the user. The purpose of this correction is not to make the number of records or the scope of fields seem larger than it is, but to clearly show the real risks the user faces.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Leaked Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>When the areas shown in the Guardia Civil forum record are evaluated together, the risk does not arise from a single type of data alone. When email addresses, usernames, password hash information, password salts, and password data are present within the same user profile, attackers can prepare more personal and convincing messages. Verified contact information, account, or profile identifiers in the record increase the risk of social engineering and profile matching. Additional account context in the record can make it easier for fake messages to appear as if they are coming from a legitimate service flow.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The main risks highlighted in this incident are phishing, account takeover, and social engineering scenarios. Attackers can combine fields in the record when preparing fake account alerts, password resets, membership renewals, support notifications, or security verification messages. The use of account details that actually exist in the record can weaken the user's security reflex. Therefore, even if the record does not contain a password, the risk of profile matching and targeted fraud continues; if there is a password field, the risk increases even more because the same or similar password could be tried on other services.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The first step for Foro del Guardia Civil users is to match the fields in this record with their own account habits. If the same verified account or contact information has been used on other services, incoming messages should be evaluated in terms of the entire digital identity. If the same username is also used on social media, gaming, forums, education, travel, or shopping accounts, the risk of profile matching increases. Users should not click directly on unexpected links, should check account transactions through a known domain, should switch to unique passwords for accounts where they use the same password, and should enable multi-factor authentication where possible. For records with password hash information, old password patterns should also be reviewed; completely unique and long passwords should be preferred instead of small character changes.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>For institutions, the Foro del Guardia Civil record is important to understand in which data context employees' emails or personal accounts appear on external services. If an employee has used their corporate email on such services, attackers can use the same information in messages resembling fake support requests, invoice notifications, account verification, or internal communication flow. Security teams should monitor not only breaches containing passwords but also the fields of identity, account, communication, and usage context verified in the record as a social engineering risk.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The Foro del Guardia Civil data breach record is therefore limited to supported fields, but it should be treated as a record that requires attention in terms of security impact. The most accurate approach for users is to verify incoming links through an independent channel, update account recovery options, check other accounts where the same information is used, and not hastily approve unexpected verification or payment requests. This page has been updated so that users searching the Foro del Guardia Civil data breach can understand the number of records, data fields, and priority defense steps in an unexaggerated manner.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>This latest check recorded in the Guardia Civil forum is intended to ensure that the data field list remains consistent with the description visible to the user. The person performing the search should only see supported data types on this page; additional claims beyond the supported fields should not be added just to make the risk appear greater. This approach helps individual users choose the correct security step and helps institutions distinguish which employee data is actually at risk. The current scope of the data class is limited to the following fields: Email addresses, Usernames, Password hash metadata, Password salts, Passwords.\u003C\u002Fp>","Foro del Guardia Civil Alleged Data Exposure. 233.1 Thousand email identifiers are reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Usernames, Password hash…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fforo-del-guardia-civil.svg",false,{"name":7,"sector":40,"country":41,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":42,"websiteStatus":42,"websiteCheckedAt":13},"Law Enforcement Forum \u002F Online Community","Spain",""]