[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1gh5j79gyu9ns":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"modifiedDate":12,"contentUpdatedAt":13,"source":14,"sourceUrl":15,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":17,"affectedCount":17,"affectedCountStatus":18,"affectedCountLowerBound":19,"affectedCountUnit":20,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":21,"dataClasses":22,"description":30,"seoTitle":15,"seoTitleEn":31,"seoDescription":15,"seoDescriptionEn":32,"logoUrl":33,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":34,"isMalware":34,"company":35},"68e3266eda11adda488251fc","get-revenge-on-your-ex","Get Revenge On Your Ex Data Breach","getrevengeonyourex.com","2022-09-09T00:00:00.000Z","2022-11-15T01:57:17.000Z","2026-07-02T12:26:55.059Z","2026-07-18T23:51:21.273Z","Third party breach","",[],79195,"known",null,"unknown","Medium",[23,24,25,26,27,28,29],"Email addresses","IP addresses","Names","Passwords","Phone numbers","Physical addresses","Purchases","\u003Cp>The verified incident that occurred in September 2022 on the controversial online service Get Revenge On Your Ex is a data breach used for purposes of revenge and harassment. The verified scope is 79,195 unique email records. The dataset may include not only individuals who purchased the service but also those who became targets of the service. Affected data groups include email addresses, IP addresses, names, plain text passwords, phone numbers, physical addresses, and purchase histories. These records are highly sensitive because when physical address, phone number, name, and target context are found together, there is a risk in terms of harassment, threats, privacy violations, and real-world security. Payment card, bank account, official ID, date of birth, or private message content are not among the verified data classes for this incident.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaking Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>One of the most critical areas in this breach is plain text passwords. A plain text password allows the attacker to try the password directly without any need for a hash cracking process. If the same password is reused on email, social media, shopping, financial, or other accounts, the risk of account takeover arises immediately. Purchase history can also reveal the relationship with the service and affect a person's reputation, privacy, or security.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>When physical addresses, phone numbers, IP addresses, and names are found together, the risk is not limited to online phishing. This data can be used for targeted harassment, threats, fake deliveries, fake support calls, attempts at exposure, or social engineering. The fact that the dataset can include both customers and targeted individuals means that the affected person could be at risk even if they have not used the service. Therefore, if the result is positive, the user should not take the incident lightly.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The verified number for this record should be kept as 79,195. This value represents a unique email scope; it should not be assumed with certainty that each record corresponds to a single real person. Due to the operation of the service, some records may be customer information, and some may be information about a target person or a third party. Therefore, the number of records should not be presented directly as the number of active users. The sensitive context of the data set increases the risk despite the seemingly low number.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Verified data classes are email addresses, IP addresses, names, passwords, phone numbers, physical addresses, and purchase histories. The password field should be treated as plain text. Purchase history does not mean a payment card number or a bank transaction; this distinction should be preserved in the text. Since official ID, date of birth, private message, payment card, bank account, health data, or social security number are not among the verified fields, they should not be added to the record.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The highest risk lies with individuals who have an account or purchase record in this service and those who are targeted by the service. For customers, purchase history and contact information can pose reputational and privacy risks. For targeted individuals, physical address, phone number, and name information can have more serious consequences for real-world security. Therefore, a positive match should not be viewed merely as a password security incident.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Individuals who have a risk of harassment connected to an ex-partner, family, work environment, or social circle should also be cautious. Information that is difficult to change, such as addresses and phone numbers, can be used in prolonged harassment or threat attempts. IP addresses and email addresses can also be linked to a user's other accounts. The matched person should consider that, even if they did not open the account themselves, their data might be recorded as the target individual.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The user with an email address in this record must ensure that the relevant password is not used for any other account. If the same or a similar password has been used on other accounts, all relevant accounts should immediately switch to a unique, long, and hard-to-guess password. Multi-factor authentication should be enabled on email and social media accounts. This step should not be delayed due to the risk of plain text passwords.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>If a physical address or phone number is at risk, the user should document unexpected calls, messages, deliveries, threats, or disclosure attempts and, if necessary, contact the relevant platforms, service providers, or local authorities. For accounts linked to a phone number, SIM changes and account recovery security should be checked. Suspicious emails should not be clicked on, and messages claiming to be about purchases or account verification should be verified through an independent channel.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>This incident shows that having information such as physical address and phone number in high-risk services can have long-term security effects. Users should carefully consider sharing personal email, primary phone number, and home address in sensitive context services. Using a separate email address, mailbox, virtual phone, or limited profile information when necessary can reduce privacy risks.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The key lesson for service providers is that in services with a high risk of harassment or privacy issues, the responsibility for data storage and security is much greater. Storing passwords in plain text is unacceptable; password data must be protected using strong and up-to-date methods. Fields such as address, phone number, and purchase history should not be retained longer than necessary, access should be strictly limited, and users should be clearly informed about which fields are affected.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>During the record check for the Get Revenge On Your Ex violation, the result indicates whether the entered email address is found in this verified data set. If the result is positive, the email address, IP address, name, plain text password, phone number, physical address, and purchase history risk should be evaluated together. If the result is negative, it means no match was found in this specific data set; this does not prove that the person was not involved in other sensitive data incidents.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The correct user action is to clear all accounts where the plain text password was used, strengthen email and social media security, monitor unexpected communications for phone and address security, document signs of harassment or threats, and get support if necessary. This record should be considered not only as a technical account security issue but also as a risk to physical security, privacy, and reputation.\u003C\u002Fp>","Get Revenge On Your Ex Data Breach (79.2 Thousand Reported Records)","Get Revenge On Your Ex Data Breach. 79.2 Thousand reported records were reported. Reported data: Email addresses, IP addresses, Names. Review the scope…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fgetrevengeonyourex_com.webp",false,{"name":36,"sector":37,"country":38,"website":9,"websiteArchiveUrl":15,"websiteStatus":15,"websiteCheckedAt":19},"Get Revenge On Your Ex","Online Revenge Service","Unknown"]