[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f136sdobhhydz2":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"modifiedDate":12,"contentUpdatedAt":12,"source":13,"sourceUrl":14,"sourceUrls":15,"pwnCount":16,"affectedCount":16,"affectedCountStatus":17,"affectedCountLowerBound":18,"affectedCountUnit":19,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":20,"dataClasses":21,"description":26,"seoTitle":14,"seoTitleEn":27,"seoDescription":14,"seoDescriptionEn":28,"logoUrl":29,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":30,"isMalware":30,"company":31},"68e3266eda11adda48825203","giglio","Giglio Data Breach","giglio.com","2025-08-09T00:00:00.000Z","2025-09-01T09:51:11.000Z","2026-07-29T11:13:00.741Z","Third party breach","",[],1026468,"known",null,"email_identifiers","Critical",[22,23,24,25],"Email addresses","Names","Phone numbers","Physical addresses","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>The August 2025 dataset attributed to Giglio\u003C\u002Fstrong> is a corpus public breach source catalogues with 1,026,468 unique emails and name, phone, and physical-address classes. While public breach source authenticated the corpus itself, it describes it as allegedly obtained from Giglio, and the company did not respond to repeated disclosure attempts. Non-response is not confirmation.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>August 9 is the structured date; the narrative says only August 2025, and no exact attack or exfiltration day is proven. The 1,026,468 figure is not customers, accounts, people, or raw rows; it is a unique-email measure. There is no local import job, source file, or searchable person-level data.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The record does not establish identity, Giglio customer or account status, fashion or luxury interest, purchases, orders, delivery, returns, residence, phone or address ownership, wealth, field co-occurrence, compromise, or misuse. Password, card, purchase, and identity classes are absent from public breach source's classes, but this does not prove they were absent from the entire alleged archive.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Phone, address, and luxury-retail associations must remain private. A message quoting real contact or address details does not authenticate the sender and should be checked through independent official channels. With no credential field, password actions should not be based on this record.\u003C\u002Fp>","Giglio Data Breach (1 Million Email Identifiers)","Giglio Data Breach. 1 Million email identifiers were reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers. Review the scope, risks, and protective…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fgiglio_com.webp",false,{"name":32,"sector":33,"country":34,"website":9,"websiteArchiveUrl":14,"websiteStatus":14,"websiteCheckedAt":18},"Giglio","Fashion Retail","Italy"]