[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f20io4ld4su0r2":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"modifiedDate":12,"contentUpdatedAt":12,"source":13,"sourceUrl":14,"sourceUrls":15,"pwnCount":16,"affectedCount":16,"affectedCountStatus":17,"affectedCountLowerBound":18,"affectedCountUnit":19,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":20,"dataClasses":21,"description":26,"seoTitle":14,"seoTitleEn":27,"seoDescription":14,"seoDescriptionEn":28,"logoUrl":29,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":30,"isMalware":30,"company":31},"68e3266eda11adda48825204","glamira","GLAMIRA Data Breach","glamira.com","2023-12-16T00:00:00.000Z","2025-01-03T07:55:22.000Z","2026-07-29T11:13:00.741Z","Third party breach","",[],874594,"known",null,"email_identifiers","High",[22,23,24,25],"Email addresses","Names","Phone numbers","Undefined purchase data","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>The dataset attributed to GLAMIRA in 2023\u003C\u002Fstrong> is a corpus public breach source catalogues with 874,594 unique emails and name, phone, and purchase classes. The incident link is a Reddit comment apparently reproducing a GLAMIRA statement that an unauthorized person briefly accessed one server. Until the full company communication and corpus source are archived, this indirect evidence does not provide exact chronology.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>December 16 is public breach source's structured date; the narrative supports only late 2023. The 874,594 figure is not customers, accounts, purchases, people, or raw rows; it is a unique-email measure. It is undefined whether “purchases” means order IDs, dates, products, amounts, currencies, recipients, or another value.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>There is no local import job, source file, or searchable person-level data. The record does not establish identity, GLAMIRA customer or account status, jewelry, engagement, wedding, or gift interest, product value, wealth or relationship status, purchaser or recipient role, phone ownership, field co-occurrence, compromise, or misuse.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Phone, purchase, and intimate jewelry context must remain private. Real contact or purchase details do not authenticate a sender, and unexpected requests should be checked through independent official channels. Because no password field is reported, password or MFA actions should not be based on this record.\u003C\u002Fp>","GLAMIRA Data Breach (874.6 Thousand Email Identifiers)","GLAMIRA Data Breach. 874.6 Thousand email identifiers were reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Names, Phone numbers. Review the scope, risks, and…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fglamira_com.webp",false,{"name":32,"sector":33,"country":34,"website":9,"websiteArchiveUrl":14,"websiteStatus":14,"websiteCheckedAt":18},"GLAMIRA","eCommerce \u002F Jewelry","Germany"]