[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fnvdntdl01v3q":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":14,"source":15,"sourceUrl":16,"sourceUrls":17,"pwnCount":19,"affectedCount":19,"affectedCountStatus":20,"affectedCountLowerBound":21,"affectedCountUnit":22,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":23,"dataClasses":24,"description":26,"seoTitle":27,"seoTitleEn":28,"seoDescription":27,"seoDescriptionEn":29,"logoUrl":30,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":31,"isMalware":31,"company":32},"68e3266eda11adda488252bf","mSpy","mSpy Data Breach","mspy","mspy.com","2015-05-14T00:00:00.000Z","2015-05-28T18:09:16.000Z","2024-07-11T19:29:17.000Z","2026-07-18T23:54:35.743Z","Sensitive device usage tracking breach","https:\u002F\u002Fkrebsonsecurity.com\u002F2015\u002F05\u002Fmobile-spy-software-maker-mspy-hacked-customer-data-leaked\u002F",[16,18],"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mspy.com\u002F",699793,"known",null,"unknown","High",[25],"Device usage tracking data","\u003Cp>The mSpy data breach is a sensitive leak dating back to 2015 associated with mSpy, a provider of mobile device monitoring services. The verified scope includes 699,793 accounts, and the canonical data class is device usage tracking data. This incident should be regarded differently from an ordinary membership leak because the service in question is used to monitor phones, tablets, and online account activities. Therefore, the risk is not limited to the person who purchased the service; the messages, location, communication network, and daily routines of the monitored device owner may also have been affected. The matched user should first determine whether this account belongs to them or if it is related to someone else's device monitoring. This record is independent of a separate mSpy incident from 2024.The date here is May 14, 2015, the date of record is May 28, 2015, and the main risk area is sensitive device activity records. Since the result is kept in the sensitive class, personal, social, and legal effects should be considered.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaked Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Verified data class is device usage tracking data. Although this phrase may appear as a single-line field, it represents a fairly broad area of privacy in terms of mobile monitoring services. Details such as device movements, location history, messaging habits, call history, social app usage, browsing activities, screen activity, and keyboard inputs are evaluated within this risk framework. Since each sub-item is not verified as a separate data class, a single canonical field is maintained in the record; however, the risk communicated to the user encompasses the real impact of this field on daily life. Such a leak can provide attackers not only with account information but also strong clues about the person’s private relationships, movement habits, and communication patterns.Associating an account for the person using the service can create reputation and blackmail risks. For the person being monitored, the risk is greater, because the person may have been tracked without their consent. Therefore, users who see this record should not only focus on password security, but also follow a broader control process in terms of device integrity, personal safety, and privacy.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The verified incident date is May 14, 2015, the addition date is May 28, 2015, and the number of affected accounts is 699,793. The record is classified as sensitive. This classification arises because a person's inclusion in this record could cause social or personal harm. The canonical data field is device usage tracking data; therefore, separate fields such as email address, password, payment card, or ID should not be added to this record. Although news sources indicate that the incident involves a very broad and private context of device data, the safest approach for data fields is to preserve the single verified field. Since there are mixed signals about the company’s historical headquarters information, the country field does not carry a definitive claim of legal headquarters.The current website content of the mSpy service confirms that the service is a phone monitoring and tracking tool; this information is used for industry and risk context, not to expand the scope of a violation. This record is also separate from the mSpy incident connected to separate customer support records in 2024. Users should assess the date, data class, and sensitive classification according to the 2015 incident while reviewing this page.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The group at the highest risk consists of individuals who had an mSpy account or used an email address associated with this service during the 2015 period. These individuals may encounter messages containing targeted threats, reputational damage, fake legal notices, or payment demands due to the purpose of using the service. The second risk group includes individuals who may have had tracking software on their device. These individuals may not see the record with their own email; however, they might have been affected as the target device of another account. The third group consists of individuals who use the same email address for sensitive personal accounts. An email address associated with the tracking service can help attackers craft more convincing extortion or social engineering messages.In cases of domestic violence, separation processes, workplace stalking, child safety discussions, or relationships with a risk of surveillance, this record should be handled more carefully. People using corporate devices may also be at risk, as device tracking can affect areas such as work correspondence, contact lists, and location information. If there are signs like unexpected battery drain, unknown administrator privileges, strange notifications, or an unrecognized backup account, the device should be examined as well.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The first step for users matching this record is to secure their email account. Unknown sessions should be closed, recovery addresses and phone numbers should be checked, a strong and unique password should be chosen, and two-factor authentication should be enabled. If old passwords used during the same period are valid on other accounts, those accounts should also be updated. Individuals suspected of device tracking should not be satisfied with only checking the app list. On mobile devices, administrator permissions, accessibility rights, unknown profiles or certificates, location sharing settings, backup accounts, and unusual data usage should be examined. If the risk is high, the device should be backed up in a trusted environment, checked with expert support, and, if necessary, a clean installation should be preferred.If threat, harassment, or blackmail messages are received, links should not be opened, payments should not be sent, and the messages should be kept as evidence. In situations where there is a personal safety risk, technical steps should be planned not hastily, but together with a trusted person, lawyer, or local support channel. Deleting the tracking application immediately should be considered carefully, as in some cases it may alert the other party, so the security plan should be prioritized.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The mSpy incident shows that device monitoring services pose serious data protection risks not only for the person purchasing the service but also for the individuals being monitored. In the long term, users should regularly check which apps have high privileges on their devices, limit location sharing and cloud syncing settings, and keep account recovery options reliable. Email accounts should be protected with a strong password and two-factor authentication, and the same password should not be reused for sensitive accounts. Mobile devices should have up-to-date operating systems, permission to install unknown apps should remain disabled, and reliable channels should be used for sensitive communications. If the use of monitoring tools comes up in a family or work environment, explicit consent, legal boundaries, and data retention duration should be considered.Secret tracking should not be seen as a normal security tool. For service providers, such data should be protected at the highest level of sensitivity, unnecessary record-keeping should be reduced, access logs should be regularly reviewed, and user notifications should not be delayed. On the user side, the most lasting strategy is to close old accounts, regularly audit device permissions, and manage services with high privacy risks using separate email addresses.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Matching with the mSpy record indicates that the relevant email address is among the records connected to the 2015 sensitive device tracking data incident. When the user sees this result, they should first try to determine whether the account is related to their own service usage or to a situation that could be associated with another person's device tracking. Email security should be checked, and if old passwords are valid elsewhere, they should be changed. If there is a suspicion of device tracking, unknown administrator permissions, accessibility rights, location sharing, backup accounts, and unusual data usage on the phone, tablet, or computer should be examined. In situations where there is a personal security risk, this examination should be conducted carefully; immediately removing the tracking tool is not always the safest first step.It may be more appropriate to act with a reliable technical expert, lawyer, or support line. Since this record is sensitive, the social and legal implications should be considered before the results are shared with others. The goal is not only to clear the old account but also to protect the person's digital and physical security together. Therefore, when a match is found, email security, device monitoring, account list, and personal security plan should be addressed in the same process.\u003C\u002Fp>","","mSpy Data Breach (699.8 Thousand Reported Records)","mSpy Data Breach. 699.8 Thousand reported records were reported. Reported data: Device usage tracking data. Review the scope, risks, and protective steps.","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fmspy_com.webp",false,{"name":7,"sector":33,"country":34,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":27,"websiteStatus":27,"websiteCheckedAt":21},"Monitoring software \u002F spyware","Unknown"]