[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f2533iwz26v6uy":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":13,"source":14,"sourceUrl":15,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":17,"affectedCount":17,"affectedCountStatus":18,"affectedCountLowerBound":19,"affectedCountUnit":20,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":21,"dataClasses":22,"description":28,"seoTitle":29,"seoTitleEn":30,"seoDescription":29,"seoDescriptionEn":31,"logoUrl":32,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":33,"isSpamList":33,"isMalware":33,"company":34},"68e3266eda11adda488252eb","OGUsers2020","OGUsers (2020 breach)","ogusers-2020-breach","ogusers.com","2020-04-02T00:00:00.000Z","2020-04-04T08:27:13.000Z","2026-07-29T11:40:53.262Z","Verified breach record","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zdnet.com\u002Farticle\u002Fhacking-forum-gets-hacked-for-the-second-time-in-a-year\u002F",[15],263189,"known",null,"unknown","High",[23,24,25,26,27],"Email addresses","IP addresses","Passwords","Private messages","Usernames","\u003Cp>The OGUsers 2020 data breach is a security incident associated with the forum known for account takeover and SIM swap fraud, linked to the second data loss the forum experienced in April 2020. According to verified information, the incident occurred on April 2, 2020, affecting account data associated with 263,189 email addresses. The dataset includes email addresses, IP addresses, usernames, private messages, and salted MD5 password hashes. Therefore, the risk is not limited to password changes; it should also be considered in terms of in-forum communication, user identity, and account attempts on different services.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Since OGUsers is associated with multiple different incidents under the same domain name, the 2020 record should be kept separate from the 2019, 2021, and 2022 incidents. This distinction is important to prevent duplication; the date, the number of affected accounts, and the time of addition are different. In the 2020 incident, the affected data was spread across user accounts and other tables. If the same email or username was used on different forums, social media accounts, or gaming communities, attackers could use this data in broader identity matching and account testing processes.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Types of Leaked Data and Their Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The verified data types are email addresses, IP addresses, passwords, private messages, and usernames. Email addresses are the primary point of contact for targeted phishing messages. Usernames, especially if associated with short or valuable account names, can be matched with a person's traces on other platforms. IP addresses can provide inferences about approximate location, service provider, and access habits. Private messages carry a separate risk as they can contain forum agreements, account buying and selling, trade discussions, or snippets of personal communication.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The fact that passwords are stored as salted MD5 hashes also requires attention. Salting reduces the chance that the exact same password will appear as the same hash; however, MD5 is an old method that can be calculated quickly and is not accepted as a modern password storage standard. Short, repetitive, or dictionary-based passwords are easier to guess. If the same password was used on other services, the OGUsers 2020 leak could turn into lists for trying against social media, email, gaming, cryptocurrency, or forum accounts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Source comparison confirms April 2, 2020, as the date of the OGUsers 2020 incident, April 4, 2020, as the addition time, and 263,189 affected email addresses. The scope is limited to email addresses, IP addresses, passwords, private messages, and usernames. Phone numbers, physical addresses, payment cards, government IDs, birth dates, real names, or photo leaks are not among the verified data types for this incident. Adding unverified fields gives the user a misleading risk picture.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Although this incident is marked as sensitive in the local record, the verified source classification does not indicate a sensitive flag. Nevertheless, due to the context of private messaging and account takeover, the risk level is serious for the user. The distinction here is important: even without a sensitive class label, a record may require users to take precautions for privacy and account security. Therefore, the explanation should focus on verified fields such as private messages, IP addresses, and weak password hash types, without exaggeration.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The highest risk applies to people who reuse the email address and password they use for their OGUsers account on other services. Since the forum's subject area revolves around account names, social media profiles, and online identities, keeping the same username in different places creates additional risks. Names mentioned in private messages, deal details, or old connections can also be used for identity matching and targeted threat messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>People involved in environments related to SIM swapping, account hijacking, and the valuable username market should be especially cautious. Attackers can target social media, email, or phone account recovery processes using old forum data. When IP address, email, and username are combined, messages can become more convincing. Therefore, simply changing the forum password is not enough; security checks are needed on all accounts associated with the same credentials.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The first step is to ensure that the old password used on the OGUsers account is not active on any other account. New, unique, and strong passwords should be chosen for all services where the same or similar password was used. The email account is a priority because password reset and account recovery processes usually proceed through email. Multi-factor authentication should be enabled on the email account, and recovery addresses, forwarding rules, and recent sessions should be checked.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In case private messages are exposed, links, account names, or payment arrangements mentioned in old forum discussions should be reviewed. Unexpected password reset messages, social media account alerts, phone line porting notifications, or cryptocurrency account login alerts should be taken seriously. The user should not respond to messages containing threats or pressure; should not attempt to log in through the links, and should close sessions through the official security centers of the relevant services.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>In the long term, using a different password for each service is a fundamental rule. A password manager is a practical solution for finding old repetitions and securely storing new strong passwords. People with valuable social media names, gaming accounts, or community profiles should enable multi-factor authentication not only on their email but on all of these accounts. Where possible, app-based authentication or a security key should be preferred over SMS-based verification.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Using the same username across different platforms for years makes identity matching easier. Users should periodically check their old forum memberships, associated email addresses, and profile descriptions. In cases where private messages are leaked, not only passwords but also past communications are part of the risk surface. Therefore, accounts, links, and payment channels mentioned in old conversations should also be included in the security plan.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>A user who sees the OGUsers 2020 result on LeakData should evaluate the incident without confusing it with other OGUsers records. This result is connected to the incident dated April 2, 2020, and 263,189 email addresses. The verified fields are email addresses, IP addresses, passwords, private messages, and usernames. The user's priority should be to disable password repeats, strengthen the email account, protect social media accounts, and check phone line security.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In this case, since phone number, payment card, physical address, official ID, date of birth, and photo fields are not verified, the action plan should not be based on this data. On the other hand, private message, IP address, email, and password fields carry real risk. The user should use a strong password and multi-factor authentication on all accounts associated with the same email and username; for critical accounts mentioned in old forum posts, a separate security check should be performed.\u003C\u002Fp>","","OGUsers (2020 breach) (263.2 Thousand Reported Records)","OGUsers (2020 breach). 263.2 Thousand reported records were reported. Reported data: Email addresses, IP addresses, Passwords. Review the scope, risks, and…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fogusers_com.webp",false,{"name":35,"sector":36,"country":37,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":38,"websiteStatus":39,"websiteCheckedAt":40},"OGUsers","Account marketplace forum","Global","https:\u002F\u002Fweb.archive.org\u002Fweb\u002F20221024203949\u002Fhttps:\u002F\u002Fogusers.com\u002F","archived","2026-07-29T11:30:22.391Z"]