[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1ntouhxpy5v3x":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"publishedAt":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":14,"source":15,"sourceUrl":16,"sourceUrls":17,"pwnCount":19,"affectedCount":19,"affectedCountStatus":20,"affectedCountLowerBound":12,"affectedCountUnit":21,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"contentLocale":22,"availableLocales":23,"translations":25,"severity":28,"dataClasses":29,"description":39,"seoTitle":40,"seoDescription":41,"logoUrl":42,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":43,"isMalware":43,"company":44},"6a45367ec7fb1e37bace5f47","orange","Orange Data Breach","orange.com","2025-02-24T00:00:00.000Z","2025-02-25T15:50:57.000Z",null,"2026-09-17T16:26:11.191Z","2026-07-19T00:03:44.260Z","Third party breach","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.orange.ro\u002F",[16,18],"https:\u002F\u002Fxposedornot.com\u002Fbreaches\u002Forange-romania",568604,"known","unknown","en",[22,24],"tr",{"en":26,"tr":27},{"slug":7},{"slug":7},"High",[30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"Email addresses","Usernames","Physical addresses","Phone numbers","Names","Employee data","Invoices","Contracts","Partial payment card data","\u003Cp>The Orange data breach record is a security incident that came to light in February 2025 and is associated with approximately 569,000 records. This record, linked to the telecom brand, has been assessed as a broader record that significantly overlaps with the Orange Romania incident during the same period. This statement has been prepared to clarify which data fields of the user may be at risk, the boundaries for verifying the incident, and the applicable security measures.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>It has been marked as unverified because the record has not been confirmed as a separate incident; nevertheless, employee documents, invoices, contracts, phone numbers, and partial payment card fields pose sensitive risks. Only data classes consistent with the available record have been used in the text; unverified technical details, different incidents, or similarly named services are not presented as definite information under this record. Thus, the user can see the real risks without exaggeration but without leaving anything out.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Leaking Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The types of data listed in this record are: email addresses, usernames, physical addresses, phone numbers, names, employee data, invoices, contracts, and partial payment card data. The telecommunications and contract context can make fake invoices, subscriptions, line verification, or payment messages more convincing. When used together, these fields can make fake notifications, account recovery, targeted calls, identity correlation, or fraud attempts more convincing.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>In this record, the password field is not listed; the risk arises from contract, invoice, phone, and partial payment card information. Even in records without a password, fields such as phone, address, IP, device information, business profile, membership, or physical location alone can pose a significant risk. If there is a password or password-like field, it should also be checked whether the same information is repeated across different services.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Although the record is associated with the domain orange.com, it carries the potential to overlap with regional Orange events on the same date. Therefore, the record has not been verified and has been classified as potentially duplicate. The scope has been written by evaluating the domain name, sector, country, number of accounts, data classes, and potential overlap with similar events separately. Data types that are not listed have not been shown to the user as if they exist.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>It has not been finalized as a separate violation; it has been explained to the user based on risk, existing data fields, and the possibility of conflicts. In records with verification limits, the text is not established as a definite company statement. In records that may be duplicates or resemble a sub-incident of another brand, this distinction is indirectly shown to the user, and data fields are not unnecessarily expanded.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Employees associated with the Orange brand, customers, individuals with contract or invoice information, and users whose phone numbers are exposed are at risk. The main risk for these individuals is that the leaked information may be matched with information used in other accounts. If the same email, phone number, username, IP, address, social profile, or password is repeated across different accounts, the attack surface increases.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Telecom context can be used in fake customer service, billing, payment card verification, contract renewal, or line operation messages. Media, real estate, telecom, logistics, gaming, video, Discord services, dating platforms, and professional data contexts produce different risks. The user should consider not only the data fields but also which service context these fields are associated with.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Affected users should verify payment and line verification requests received by phone or email through the official channel. If a password or password-like field is listed, users should change it on all accounts where they use the same or similar password, use a unique password, and enable multi-factor authentication wherever possible. The email account should also be checked.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>In records containing phone, address, location, IP, device, work profile, billing, contract, or platform ID, users should check account recovery options, session history, forwarding rules, and suspicious messages. In corporate accounts, this information should be shared with the security team.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Strong customer authentication, transaction notifications, and second-channel control in document sharing are important for telecom accounts. In the long term, a password manager, unique password, multi-factor authentication, closure of old accounts, and deletion of unnecessary profile fields are the basic defense. Since permanent personal data cannot be recovered, account behavior and verification processes should be strengthened.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>From the perspective of institutions, these events show that data minimization, third-party access, retention period of customer records, employee documents, and incident notification processes need to be regularly audited. On the user side, not repeating the same identity information across different services reduces persistent risk.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The user should check phone, invoice, and payment notifications, being aware that if there is a match with this record, there could also be a conflict with the Orange Romania record. If a match is observed, the user should first read which data fields are listed, and then prioritize the steps accordingly. If there is a password, password change should be prioritized; if there is an address or phone, fraud warning; if there is an IP or device, session control; if there is sensitive membership, privacy control should be prioritized.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Final assessment: This record contains sensitive data fields, but definitive language has been avoided because verification as a separate incident is limited and there is a risk of duplication. The user should compare this record with their own account history; they should check the services where they have used the same email, phone, username, IP, address, or password individually. Suspicious search, email, message, or account recovery notifications should be considered higher risk after the incident.\u003C\u002Fp>","Orange Data Breach (568.6 Thousand Reported Records)","Orange Data Breach. 568.6 Thousand reported records are reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Usernames, Physical addresses. Review the scope, risks, and…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Forange_com.png",false,{"name":45,"sector":46,"country":47,"website":9,"websiteArchiveUrl":48,"websiteStatus":48,"websiteCheckedAt":12},"Orange","Telecommunications \u002F Group-level Record","France",""]