[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f29ffhmvu8bjay":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"publishedAt":13,"modifiedDate":14,"contentUpdatedAt":15,"source":16,"sourceUrl":17,"sourceUrls":18,"pwnCount":21,"affectedCount":21,"affectedCountStatus":22,"affectedCountLowerBound":13,"affectedCountUnit":23,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"contentLocale":24,"availableLocales":25,"translations":27,"severity":30,"dataClasses":31,"description":34,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":36,"logoUrl":37,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":38,"isMalware":38,"company":39},"6a45b7a5ad45a041b1ce5f47","Pron","Pron Data Breach","pron","pron.com","2011-06-01T00:00:00.000Z","2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z",null,"2026-09-17T16:27:41.515Z","2026-07-27T16:11:14.337Z","Unverified breach record","https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FLulzSec#50_Days_of_Lulz",[17,19,20],"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pcworld.com\u002Farticle\u002F503463\u002Flulzsec-releases-porn-site-user-data.html","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.computerweekly.com\u002Fnews\u002F1280096645\u002FLulzSec-hacks-porn-site-and-publishes-military-and-government-passwords",25497,"known","unknown","en",[24,26],"tr",{"en":28,"tr":29},{"slug":9},{"slug":9},"Medium",[32,33],"Email addresses","Passwords","\u003Cp>The pron data breach is an unverified security incident dated June 2011 that affected user accounts of an adult content site associated with the domain pron.com, which is now inactive. In publicly available breach inventories, the main scope is listed as 25,497 accounts, including email addresses and plaintext passwords. A separate directory shows a larger variant of 26,137 individuals for the same incident, with an unknown date. Since the site is adult content and the passwords were stored in a readable format, the incident is considered sensitive; however, due to the lack of official company confirmation, the unindependent verification is maintained.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaked Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The supported data fields are email addresses and passwords. The presence of passwords in plain text directly enables session attempts for an attacker; there is no need for hash cracking or additional decryption processes. The greatest risk in such data sets is the repeated use of the same email and password pair across different services such as email accounts, social media, cloud storage, financial services, gaming accounts, or work sessions. The adult content context additionally creates a separate sensitivity in terms of privacy pressure, targeted fraud, and blackmail attempts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>For this event, additional personal fields such as phone number, payment card, full address, real name, or identification document were not reliably supported. Therefore, the data categories were limited to email addresses and passwords. Although there is a numerical difference in a broader index, the data fields rely on the same basic binary, namely email and plain text password. From the user's perspective, the practical risk is related to whether the password has been reused on other accounts. The fact that the same password remained on a single old adult content site alone, if unchanged, still provides a basis for account takeover attempts years later.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The main scope is 25,497 accounts. The event date is considered June 2011, and the indexing date is October 30, 2024. The appearance of 26,137 people and unknown dates in the larger index suggests different cleaning rules, duplicate rows, retention of extra rows, or the possibility of a separate variant derived from the same event. Because of this difference, the main record was preserved with the more detailed dated scope; the larger number was left in a footnote. This way, the user is shown a scope that is more consistent with dates and data fields, rather than the maximum unconfirmed number.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>There was no official infringement notice for Porn, no direct company statement, or strong independent news confirmation. The domain showing a certificate issue in the current HTTPS check, and displaying different access behavior on the HTTP side, does not clearly prove the previous service status; it only shows that the current domain status does not give a reliable impression of a live service. Therefore, the record was not marked as verified. The information presented to the user is limited to the number, date, country, category, and data fields supported in the open inventories.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The highest risk is for those who reuse the password they use on their Pron account for their personal email, bank or payment services, social media profiles, cloud storage, work accounts, or other adult content sites. The email account is particularly critical; if the email inbox is compromised, an attacker can use password reset messages for other services. The membership signal of an adult content site can also make the user psychologically vulnerable. In such cases, attackers may force the person to make hasty decisions through fake alerts, privacy threats, fee demands, or account verification messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>It would be wrong to consider the risk of old records as expired. Even an incident from 2011 can be effective in new attacks if the same password has remained on other accounts for years. Email addresses that haven't changed for a long time, people who don't use a password manager, and users who make small additions to the same password carry more risk. Additionally, due to the adult content context, some users may try to ignore the incident; this causes delays in implementing the main security measures. The most correct approach is to address the match with the priority of account security rather than privacy concerns.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The first step is to identify all accounts that use the same or similar password as the one used for Pron and change their passwords. Email accounts, financial services, social media, cloud storage, and work accounts should be prioritized. A unique and long password should be chosen for each service, and if possible, a randomly generated password should be created using a password manager. Multi-factor authentication should be enabled on the email account; strong options such as app-based codes, hardware keys, or passkeys should be preferred.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Suspicious login alerts, unexpected password reset messages, threat emails with adult content themes, and messages requesting payment should be carefully examined. These types of messages should not be replied to, money should not be sent, and links should not be clicked. It should also be checked whether the same password exists in old forum, game, file sharing, or social network accounts. If registered with a work email or corporate account, the company's security team should be informed. This way, early precautions can be taken against the risk of testing company systems with the same credentials.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>For permanent protection, using a unique password for each account should become standard. Separate passwords should be preferred for adult content, forums, games, shopping, and social media accounts; the same password should never be reused with critical accounts. A password manager should be used regularly both to generate strong passwords and to find reused old passwords. Old and unused accounts should be closed; for accounts that cannot be closed, the password should be made unique and, if possible, the email address should be updated.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In terms of privacy, using a separate email instead of your personal main email on sites in the sensitive category can reduce risks. However, the strongest protection is still a unique password and multi-factor authentication. Users should not forget that old breaches can mix into new datasets years later. If a password has circulated in plain text, it can no longer be considered secure. Therefore, ensuring that old passwords are not live anywhere protects not just one site but your entire digital identity.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Users who see the Pron result on LeakData should read it not as an official company announcement, but as an unverified risk signal observed in open violation inventories. The main scope shown is 25,497 accounts; the supported data fields are email addresses and passwords. Although a larger variant includes a count of 26,137 people, the main display was not changed due to the missing date information. The result should be used especially to find password reuse and secure old accounts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The user of the matched account should first secure their email account and then change the password on all services where they use the same or a similar password. Repeated passwords should be checked in the password manager, and the login history and connected devices of old accounts should be examined. Messages containing threats, embarrassment, or payment requests with adult content should be considered high risk; security steps should be completed without responding to the sender. When accounts are separated with unique passwords, the risk of an old leak spreading to new accounts is significantly reduced.\u003C\u002Fp>","Pron Data Breach (25.5 Thousand Reported Records)","Pron Data Breach. 25.5 Thousand reported records are reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Passwords. Review the scope, risks, and protective steps.","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fpron.png",false,{"name":7,"sector":40,"country":41,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":42,"websiteStatus":42,"websiteCheckedAt":13},"Adult entertainment","United States",""]