[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1sc4vfg0f1u38":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":14,"source":15,"sourceUrl":16,"sourceUrls":17,"pwnCount":19,"affectedCount":19,"affectedCountStatus":20,"affectedCountLowerBound":21,"affectedCountUnit":22,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":23,"dataClasses":24,"description":31,"seoTitle":32,"seoTitleEn":33,"seoDescription":32,"seoDescriptionEn":34,"logoUrl":35,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":36,"isSpamList":36,"isMalware":36,"company":37},"68e3266eda11adda48825330","BVD","BVD 2021 Public Business Data Exposure","public-business-data","bvdinfo.com","2021-08-19T00:00:00.000Z","2023-10-09T07:05:10.000Z","2023-12-06T22:45:20.000Z","2026-07-21T18:52:19.013Z","Verified public data exposure","https:\u002F\u002Fkaduu.io\u002Fblog\u002F2022\u002F02\u002F04\u002Fus-strategic-company-bureau-van-dijk-hacked\u002F",[16,18],"https:\u002F\u002Fweb.archive.org\u002Fweb\u002F20231009081129\u002Fhttps:\u002F\u002Fkaduu.io\u002Fblog\u002F2022\u002F02\u002F04\u002Fus-strategic-company-bureau-van-dijk-hacked\u002F",27917714,"known",null,"email_identifiers","Critical",[25,26,27,28,29,30],"Dates of birth","Email addresses","Job titles","Names","Phone numbers","Physical addresses","\u003Cp>BVD 2021 Public Business Data Exposure concerns business information gathered from public sources and published online around August 2021. The reviewed scope contains 27,917,714 unique email addresses. That number is not a count of individually confirmed people or user accounts; the same person or organization may appear in more than one business context. The exposure results from combining open business and contact fields.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The distinction matters: a customer that used a business-information service held the compiled material. Available evidence does not establish unauthorized access to the provider's systems or exposure of the provider's parent organization's client systems. The event should therefore not be framed as a provider-company breach or a password leak; the risk comes from the combined use of otherwise public fields.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Exposed Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Verified data classes include dates of birth, email addresses, job titles, names, phone numbers, and physical addresses. The physical addresses were largely regarded as corporate locations, yet names, titles, phone numbers, and email addresses in the same collection can give fraud attempts useful context. A supplier message, executive request, recruitment contact, or support call sent in a person's name may appear more credible when it reflects real workplace details.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Persistent identifiers such as a date of birth can raise impersonation and social-engineering risk when paired with professional information. Email addresses can help attackers select targets for phishing campaigns, while direct phone numbers can be used for voice fraud or pressure through messages. Passwords, usernames, payment-card data, session details, and authentication secrets are not among the verified fields. That limit is essential when interpreting what a match can and cannot indicate.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Limits\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The event is treated as occurring around August 2021. Reports refer to a broader corpus of hundreds of gigabytes and hundreds of millions of raw rows; raw-row volume is not equivalent to a unique-person, email-address, or user-account count. The public metric is 27,917,714 unique email addresses. It does not show how often an address appeared, whether it matched more than one field, or whether the related business information remained current over time.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The material was verified as a customer-held collection of public business information. There is no evidence of unauthorized entry into the service provider's infrastructure, and no evidence that the parent organization's client environments were exposed. This distinction makes it inaccurate to label the event as a direct provider-system breach. It also cannot be concluded that every email address appeared with every listed field or that all information was current at the time of publication.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Users at Elevated Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Employees and executives whose work email, direct phone number, job title, or physical address appears in the collection are more visible targets. Attackers can use those fields to craft payment requests that imitate internal hierarchy, false supplier correspondence, human-resources contacts, or calls that appear to come from a support team. People working in finance, procurement, payroll, or executive-assistant roles should take particular care because job titles can make business-process guesses more plausible.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>A date of birth combined with a name and contact data can make it easier to link personal and professional profiles. Even where a former role, title, or company address is no longer current, an attacker may use it to build initial trust. Organizational risk is not limited to people listed in the collection; nearby teams can also be targeted through realistic messages and false work-process requests.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Immediate Protective Actions\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Verify an unexpected payment request, bank-detail change, document-sharing request, or instruction that appears to come from senior management through a separate channel. Familiar email addresses and phone numbers do not prove that a message is genuine. For sensitive requests made in a known person's name, use an already known phone number, in-person confirmation, or a separate corporate communication channel.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Keep multi-factor authentication enabled for work email and pay attention to suspicious-link and attachment warnings in email clients. There is no verified evidence of password data here, so a password should not be treated as exposed solely because of a match. General account protection still calls for strong, unique passwords, and suspicious messages should be reported promptly to the organization's security team.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Practices\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Organizations should review employee and executive contact data visible on the open web at regular intervals, remove unnecessary birth-date and direct-phone details, and limit the online exposure of high-risk roles to legitimate business needs. Critical payment, supplier-change, and confidential-document workflows should require dual approval and out-of-band confirmation. Email-domain authentication policies should remain active, and employees should receive training to recognize impersonation signals in communications.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Individuals should review professional profiles and contact preferences, close outdated work information, and reduce fields that are visible to everyone where possible. Shared verification phrases for help-desk, human-resources, and finance teams can make it harder for attackers to earn trust with stale details. Security teams can improve defensive quality by measuring phishing reports and false-payment scenarios through regular exercises.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Check and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>An email-address check can show whether an address appears in this business-data collection. A match does not prove that every listed field appeared in the same row, that the information remains current, or that an account was accessed. The count represents unique email identifiers and must not be read as an affected-account total. Use a result to review communication habits against the possibility of targeted fraud.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>When a match appears, assess unexpected requests received through work email, phone, and professional profiles with extra care. Employees should notify their security or information-technology team and report payment, access, or document requests that invoke their name or title. Multi-factor authentication, unique passwords, and current recovery options remain important for personal account protection. These measures reduce risk created when public information is combined.\u003C\u002Fp>","","BVD 2021 Public Business Data Exposure (27.9 Million Email Identifiers)","BVD 2021 Public Business Data Exposure. 27.9 Million email identifiers were reported. Reported data: Dates of birth, Email addresses, Job titles. Review the…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fbvdinfo_com.webp",false,{"name":38,"sector":39,"country":40,"website":32,"websiteArchiveUrl":32,"websiteStatus":32,"websiteCheckedAt":21},"Public Business Data Collection","Business Data Aggregation","Global"]