[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f9ot54gz32mwy":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":12,"contentUpdatedAt":13,"source":14,"sourceUrl":15,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":17,"affectedCount":17,"affectedCountStatus":18,"affectedCountLowerBound":19,"affectedCountUnit":20,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":21,"dataClasses":22,"description":27,"seoTitle":28,"seoTitleEn":29,"seoDescription":28,"seoDescriptionEn":30,"logoUrl":31,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":32,"isMalware":32,"company":33},"68e3266eda11adda48825353","RosebuttBoard","Rosebutt Board Data Breach","rosebutt-board","rosebuttboard.com","2016-05-09T00:00:00.000Z","2016-05-10T07:37:46.000Z","2026-07-18T23:57:25.911Z","Verified breach record","https:\u002F\u002Fmotherboard.vice.com\u002Fread\u002Frosebuttboard-ip-board",[15],107303,"known",null,"unknown","High",[23,24,25,26],"Email addresses","IP addresses","Passwords","Usernames","\u003Cp>The Rosebutt Board data breach is a sensitive security incident associated with the compromise of a forum with adult content and private community characteristics before May 2016. According to verified information, the incident is dated May 9, 2016, and 107,303 accounts were affected. The dataset includes email addresses, IP addresses, usernames, and password data. The password field is associated with salted MD5 hashes; this increases the risk of old password reuse, targeted phishing, and account testing across different services.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Due to the forum's subject area, the incident should be kept in a sensitive class. Associating a person with such a community can cause harm in terms of privacy, reputation, and personal safety, regardless of the account's level of active use. When an email address, IP address, and username are included in the same dataset, attackers may try to link account traces across different platforms. Therefore, the Rosebutt Board data breach should be addressed not only in terms of password security but also in terms of online identity and privacy management.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaked Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The verified data types are email addresses, IP addresses, passwords, and usernames. Email addresses are the primary points of contact for targeted phishing messages. Usernames increase the risk of identity matching if the same handle is repeated in other communities or social media accounts. IP addresses do not directly provide explicit address data; however, inferences can be made about approximate location, service provider, and access habits. When these fields are evaluated together, it becomes easier for an attacker to prepare personalized messages for the individual.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Storing password data with salted MD5 hashes is a critical security weakness. Salting reduces the chance that the exact same password will produce the same hash value; however, MD5 is an old method that can be computed quickly and is not considered a modern password storage standard. Short, dictionary-based, or repeated passwords are easier to guess. If the same password is used on other accounts, the risk can spread from the forum account to email, social media, cloud, gaming, or financial accounts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Source comparison confirms May 9, 2016 as the date of the Rosebutt Board incident, May 10, 2016 as the addition time, and 107,303 affected accounts. The verified data fields are email addresses, IP addresses, passwords, and usernames. The password context is indicated as salted MD5 hashes. Phone number, physical address, payment card, official ID, real name, date of birth, private message, photo, or purchase information are not among the verified data types for this incident.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Maintaining this boundary is necessary to present the user with an accurate risk picture. Sensitive classification is more about the forum's subject area and membership context than the number of data fields. Associating a person with such a forum can be misused by third parties. On the other hand, adding unverified fields generates false alarms. Therefore, the assessment should be conducted using email, IP address, username, and salted MD5 password hashes.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The highest risk applies to people who reuse the password they use on their Rosebutt Board account on other services. Even if the old password was changed years ago, continuing the same pattern on different services carries a risk. People who use the same username on different platforms can also be more easily matched. If the email address is linked to personal, work, or family communication, the credibility of targeted messages may increase.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Privacy risk is also important. The forum's adult and sensitive subject matter can make users vulnerable to blackmail, threats, embarrassment, or attempts to damage their reputation. The email and username information that comes with the IP address can allow the attacker to use clues in their messages similar to the user's location or access habits. For this reason, the user should not only check their password but also their email account and other accounts linked with the same nickname.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The first step is to ensure that the old password used on the Rosebutt Board account is not active on any other account. A new, unique, and strong password should be chosen for all services where the same or similar password is used. The email account is a priority because password reset links and security alerts mostly come to the email inbox. Multi-factor authentication should be enabled on the email account, and recovery addresses and recent sessions should be reviewed.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The user should be cautious against threats, account warnings, payment requests, or blackmail messages involving a forum name or former username. The presence of a real email address, IP region, or username in the message does not indicate that the message is trustworthy. One should not attempt to log in through the link, open attachments, or share the requested information. If necessary, all sessions on the relevant accounts should be closed, and security notifications should be kept active.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Using a different password for each service is a basic security rule in the long term. A password manager is an effective solution for finding old repetitions and securely storing strong passwords. If the email address used for accounts belonging to sensitive communities can be separated from daily work and family communication, the risk decreases. Repeating the same username on different platforms for years makes identity matching easier; therefore, the use of a pseudonym should also be included in the security plan.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Old forum memberships should be reviewed at regular intervals, unnecessary accounts should be closed, and profile information should be reduced. Forgotten records in services with sensitive contexts can create weak links in the security chain. Email archives, old membership notifications, and password reset messages can be used in social engineering attempts. The security plan should include password changes, email protection, multi-factor authentication, and the cleanup of old accounts together.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The user who sees the Rosebutt Board result on LeakData should take into account the incident dated May 9, 2016, and the 107,303 affected accounts. The verified fields are email addresses, IP addresses, usernames, and passwords. The password data is associated with salted MD5 hashes. The user's priority is to close old password repeats, strengthen their email account, check other accounts using the same handle, and be cautious of sensitive context-based threat messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In this incident, the action plan should not be based on the phone number, physical address, payment card, official ID, real name, date of birth, private message, photo, and purchase information since they have not been verified. In contrast, the email, IP address, username, and password fields pose real risk. The user should limit the spread of this incident to other accounts by using unique passwords, multi-factor authentication, session history checks, and the habit of not attempting logins through links.\u003C\u002Fp>","","Rosebutt Board Data Breach (107.3 Thousand Reported Records)","Rosebutt Board Data Breach. 107.3 Thousand reported records were reported. Reported data: Email addresses, IP addresses, Passwords. Review the scope, risks…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Frosebuttboard_com.webp",false,{"name":34,"sector":35,"country":36,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":28,"websiteStatus":28,"websiteCheckedAt":19},"Rosebutt Board","Adult forum","Global"]