[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f3gby72fc3c6oo":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":14,"source":15,"sourceUrl":10,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":17,"affectedCount":17,"affectedCountStatus":18,"affectedCountLowerBound":19,"affectedCountUnit":20,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":21,"dataClasses":22,"description":27,"seoTitle":10,"seoTitleEn":28,"seoDescription":10,"seoDescriptionEn":29,"logoUrl":30,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":4,"isMalware":31,"company":32},"68e3266eda11adda48825356","saver-spy","SaverSpy Spam Data List","saverspy","","2018-09-18T00:00:00.000Z","2018-09-25T10:59:05.000Z","2026-07-03T23:38:27.452Z","2026-07-18T23:57:27.505Z","Third party breach",[],2457420,"known",null,"email_identifiers","Critical",[23,24,25,26],"Email addresses","Genders","Names","Physical addresses","\u003Cp>The SaverSpy data breach is associated with the exposure of personal information linked to Yahoo addresses in a large marketing dataset left unprotected during the September 2018 period. The scope is approximately 2,457,420 unique email addresses. These records were treated as marketing and spam list data not tied to a domain; the company, country, industry, website, and data class fields were realigned with the verified scope. The sensitive flag was preserved due to physical address and gender information.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The text was rewritten to directly explain the risk, scope, and action to the user. The website field was kept empty; a format that would cause https to appear twice on the link was not used because no protocol was added. The sector was corrected from technology to marketing data and spam list; the website was left blank.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Leaked Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The types of data seen in this record are email addresses, gender information, names, and physical addresses. No password field was found; the risk is targeted marketing and physical address privacy. Unverified payment card, bank account, private message, health record, or additional profile fields were not added to the data class list; only supported fields were left.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>A Yahoo email address, name, gender, and physical address combination can personalize local service, debt, campaign, or delivery messages. The email address alone poses a risk of unwanted messages; when combined with phone, address, IP, date of birth, password, official ID, support records, vehicle information, or physical address, it becomes easier for an attacker to generate user-specific messages. Risk assessment was made based on this combined effect.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The scope was verified with 2.45 million email addresses as of September 2018. Verified fields were preserved while unconfirmed fields were excluded. The incident was not combined with similarly named data sets, events from different periods of the same company, or incorrect industry references.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The record is not a violation of a specific company account; the domain and website fields were left blank. The domain name, company name, and industry information were kept in the narrowest accurate context possible. In areas of uncertainty, a verified flag or website field was set accordingly; thus, no uncertain brand responsibility was shown to the user.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>User groups at risk may include Yahoo email users on marketing lists and individuals whose physical addresses have been circulated. Matching users should also evaluate other accounts where they use the same email, phone, username, or password pattern outside the relevant service.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The user may not directly remember registering for a service called SaverSpy; it may have come from data marketing lists. If there is a corporate email, gaming forum, motorcycle customer registration, shopping mall application, support request, rental account, marketing list, or malware context, the social engineering risk may increase. Details that appear correct are not a sign of trust on their own.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Affected users should verify campaign, debt, delivery, or local service messages containing name and address information through an independent channel. For records with a password field, all accounts using the same password should be updated; for records without a password field, the focus should be on email, phone, fake notification, privacy, and identity matching risks.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Instead of clicking on the links in the message, the address of the relevant service should be typed manually or the record in a trusted password manager should be used. Invoice, account warning, game reward, support, shipping, customer service, maintenance appointment, public notice, or subscription renewal messages should not be accepted without verification through an independent channel.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Marketing permissions should be reduced, sharing of physical addresses on unnecessary forms should be limited, and separate email usage should be considered. Users should regularly clean up old accounts, unnecessary profile fields, duplicate usernames, and old phone and address information. A unique password for each service and two-step verification wherever possible should be the basic rule.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>From the perspective of service providers, data minimization, strong password protection, monitoring of access logs, deletion of unnecessary fields, and readiness of user notification processes are required. In organizations that hold marketing data, fields such as address and gender should be protected as much as email. Accurate scope explanation is also part of the security work; exaggerated or incomplete information can direct the user to incorrect actions.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The user should first verify with the email address in this record. If a match is found, it should be assumed that the name, gender, and physical address information can be used in targeted messages. The absence of a match does not completely rule out the use of a different email or reuse of an old password; critical accounts should also be reviewed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This record has been verified and left as sensitive; it was not presented as a single website violation. In this regulation, data fields were left as English canonical classes, the description visible to the user was written in Turkish and original, unverified fields were not added, and the sensitivity flag was used only when supported by the risk context.\u003C\u002Fp>","SaverSpy Spam Data List (2.5 Million Email Identifiers)","SaverSpy Spam Data List. 2.5 Million email identifiers were reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Genders, Names. Review the scope, risks, and protective…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fsaver_spy.webp",false,{"name":33,"sector":34,"country":35,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":10,"websiteStatus":10,"websiteCheckedAt":19},"SaverSpy","Marketing Data \u002F Spam List","Global"]