[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f3nl03zk9c3qzh":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":12,"contentUpdatedAt":13,"source":14,"sourceUrl":15,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":17,"affectedCount":17,"affectedCountStatus":18,"affectedCountLowerBound":19,"affectedCountUnit":20,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":21,"dataClasses":22,"description":29,"seoTitle":30,"seoTitleEn":31,"seoDescription":30,"seoDescriptionEn":32,"logoUrl":33,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":34,"isSpamList":4,"isMalware":34,"company":35},"68e3266eda11adda48825357","SCDailyPhoneSpamList","SC Daily Phone Spam List Spam Data List","sc-daily-phone-spam-list","data4marketers.com","2015-04-14T00:00:00.000Z","2016-11-24T06:04:34.000Z","2026-07-18T23:57:22.898Z","Verified breach record","https:\u002F\u002Fbreaches.sencode.co.uk\u002Fbreaches\u002Fscdailyphonespamlist",[15],32939105,"known",null,"email_identifiers","Critical",[23,24,25,26,27,28],"Dates of birth","Email addresses","Genders","IP addresses","Names","Physical addresses","\u003Cp>The SC Daily Phone Spam List data breach is related to a large-scale phone and marketing list leak that emerged in the first half of 2015. The verified query set includes 32,939,105 individuals. The data set should be considered not as a password breach of a membership account, but as a personal contact list that could be used for spam and marketing purposes going out of control. The leaked fields consist of birth dates, email addresses, gender information, IP addresses, names, and physical addresses. When this information is combined, it increases the risk of targeted phishing, spam messages, fake campaign notifications, and personal profile matching.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaked Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The types of data confirmed in the SC Daily Phone Spam List leak include birth dates, email addresses, gender information, IP addresses, names, and physical addresses. Although there are no password or payment card data, the risk should not be underestimated as the list contains extensive personal profile details. When a name, email, and physical address appear on the same line, attackers can create more convincing fake campaign, delivery, survey, or subscription messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Date of birth and gender information can be used to create a sense of trust in social engineering. When IP address and physical address are evaluated together, regional targeting and location-themed phishing attempts are strengthened. This is particularly important because the event has the nature of a spam list, so users need to be careful against messages that come with unwanted emails, fake calls, forms asking for personal information, and account verification pretexts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The violation date is tracked as April 14, 2015, and the record was added to the verified data sets on November 24, 2016. The scope is at the level of 32,939,105 unique accounts. The domain is associated with data4marketers.com and the incident is identified as a phone spam list. Therefore, the result does not mean that a password was stolen from a specific user account; it indicates that personal communication and profile data were included in a large list.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Data classes are limited to birth dates, email addresses, genders, IP addresses, names, and physical addresses. Although the name of the phone spam list indicates phone risk, the phone number field is not included in the canonical list of queryable main data classes. This distinction is important to prevent showing the user unconfirmed fields. Risk assessment should focus on the impact of verified fields on spam, phishing, and profile matching.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The people listed are particularly at risk if they use the same email address for shopping, forums, social media, or work accounts. The combination of email address and name information strengthens fake messages that come with personal greetings. Messages supported by physical address or date of birth can appear as if they came from a real institution. This situation becomes more apparent in fake shipping notifications, sweepstakes, subscription renewals, or address verification messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Since spam lists can circulate repeatedly across different campaigns, the risk is not limited to a single date. Even old email addresses can be used to create personal profiles when matched with other data sets. Work emails or addresses shared with family can also increase the impact. Users should be especially cautious of unexpected requests for personal information, claims from regional campaigns, and fake notifications containing sensitive information such as birth dates.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Users appearing as a result of the SC Daily Phone Spam List should first check their email security and spam filters. Links from suspicious senders should not be opened, forms requesting personal information should not be responded to directly, and actions should not continue without verifying the domain. If there is an unknown forwarding rule, recovery address, or unfamiliar session in the email account, it should be removed immediately.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In this data set, since the password is not the main data field, the priority is not password panic, but reducing phishing and spam risk. Nevertheless, multi-factor authentication should be enabled on important accounts used with the same email address. Messages containing a physical address or date of birth should be examined with extra care. For messages coming under the pretense of shipping, billing, subscription, campaign, survey, or support center, one should go directly to the official site of the relevant service instead of clicking on links.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Because spam list leaks can circulate for a long time, permanent protection habits are important. Users can reduce the impact of a single list on their entire digital identity by using different email addresses for shopping, work, social media, and personal communication. Email aliases, disposable sign-up addresses, and strong spam filters help limit the spread of personal data.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Reducing personal profile information on publicly accessible pages also provides long-term protection. Birth date, address, phone number, and work information should not be shared unnecessarily. Organizations should keep phishing training up to date in case employees’ email addresses appear on spam lists, and ensure that employees verify unexpected information requests through a second channel. Email security is not only about password protection, but a discipline of distinguishing misleading messages that come with personal context.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>If the SC Daily Phone Spam List result appears in the account security check, it means that the relevant email address is included in the verified spam list dataset from 2015. This result does not indicate that one of your accounts has been directly compromised or that your password has been leaked. However, it shows that your email address is in a list that could be misused along with information such as name, date of birth, gender, IP address, or physical address.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The most appropriate action is to secure the email account, strengthen filters against spam and phishing messages, and not use direct links in messages requesting personal information. Multi-factor authentication should be enabled on important accounts, unfamiliar sessions should be closed, and unexpected campaign or address verification messages should be considered suspicious. Rather than seeing this result as an old date and moving on, one should act cautiously assuming that personal contact information may still be in circulation.\u003C\u002Fp>","","SC Daily Phone Spam List Spam Data List (32.9 Million Email Identifiers)","SC Daily Phone Spam List Spam Data List. 32.9 Million email identifiers were reported. Reported data: Dates of birth, Email addresses, Genders. Review the…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fdata4marketers_com.webp",false,{"name":36,"sector":37,"country":30,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":30,"websiteStatus":30,"websiteCheckedAt":19},"SC Daily Phone Spam List","Phone spam and marketing list"]