[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1ua1rb0dp3axw":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"breachDate":11,"addedDate":12,"modifiedDate":12,"contentUpdatedAt":13,"source":14,"sourceUrl":15,"sourceUrls":16,"pwnCount":18,"affectedCount":18,"affectedCountStatus":19,"affectedCountLowerBound":20,"affectedCountUnit":21,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":22,"dataClasses":23,"description":28,"seoTitle":29,"seoTitleEn":30,"seoDescription":29,"seoDescriptionEn":31,"logoUrl":32,"isVerified":33,"isSensitive":33,"isSpamList":33,"isMalware":33,"company":34},"68e3266eda11adda4882537e","Speedio","Speedio 2024 Alleged Data Exposure","speedio","speedio.com.br","2024-12-24T00:00:00.000Z","2025-01-30T07:14:40.000Z","2026-07-21T18:21:50.249Z","Unverified breach record","https:\u002F\u002Fdarkwebinformer.com\u002Fa-threat-actor-is-allegedly-selling-the-data-of-speedio\u002F",[15,17],"https:\u002F\u002Fspeedio.com.br\u002F",27501041,"known",null,"email_identifiers","Critical",[24,25,26,27],"Company names","Email addresses","Phone numbers","Physical addresses","\u003Cp>Speedio 2024 Alleged Data Exposure is an unverified incident record connected with a sale claim involving an organisation that presents itself as a Brazilian B2B lead-generation and business-data service. The claim reports 27,501,041 unique email identifiers dated December 24, 2024. The origin of the material, its ownership by the organisation, and its complete scope have not been independently established.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The reported figure must not be read as a confirmed customer total, active-user count, or complete profile for every person. Public reporting refers to more than 62 million rows said to consist largely of business-related information that may already be publicly available. That underlying assertion is also unconfirmed, so this entry does not present the matter as a confirmed company breach.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Exposed Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The alleged collection lists company names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses. Password values, payment-card data, government identifiers, dates of birth, session details, and file contents are not among the reported categories. This boundary matters: the listed fields alone do not establish account access, payment loss, or exposure of identity documents.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Business contact details can still make fraudulent sales offers, supplier impersonation, or account-check messages seem credible when they appear together. A company name combined with phone and address details can make a targeted call look more legitimate. It has not been established whether physical addresses are residential or business locations, which fields occur in each row, or how current the reported details are.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Limits\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The event date is associated with December 24, 2024, and public records report 27,501,041 unique email identifiers. There is no independent company statement establishing that the collection belongs to Speedio, that the material offered for sale is intact, or that every row came from the claimed origin. Public reporting mentions an allegedly exposed search service, but that technical assertion is not a verified finding.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>More than 62 million rows and 27,501,041 email identifiers are not the same measure. The first figure may include repeated or email-free business-information rows, while the second is the reported count of unique email identifiers. Addresses from common public email services are said to form a large share, but that does not prove that each address belongs to a customer, service user, or employee of the organisation.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Users at Elevated Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>People whose work email address, phone number, or company contact details may appear in B2B lead lists should be more alert. Sales, procurement, finance, human-resources, and executive-assistant roles can be targeted with fake offers or urgent payment messages. That risk does not by itself demonstrate that a person has a Speedio account or that the alleged collection belongs to the company.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>General company inboxes and publicly listed phone numbers can also be useful in targeted fraud. Even where a message includes a real company name and plausible address details, check the sender domain, link destination, and requested action through an independent channel. Requests involving new supplier details, changed bank information, fees, or document delivery deserve a second verification step.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Immediate Protective Actions\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>A match involving an email address is not evidence that a password was obtained; password values are not among the reported fields. Even so, use a unique password for the email account, enable multi-factor sign-in, and review recovery options. Where there is a genuine sign of account misuse, go directly to the known service address to review active sessions and security notices.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Treat unexpected messages or calls about examinations, sales, lead lists, invoices, delivery, or account updates with care. Rather than use a link supplied in a message, open the organisation's known address yourself. Confirm callers through an official number, and verify any request for a password, one-time code, identity document, or payment detail before taking action.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Practices\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Lasting protection for individuals comes from using a different password for every service, using a password manager, and treating the email account as a priority. Review forwarding rules, connected devices, and recovery contact details at regular intervals. Closing unused accounts or updating contact details can reduce the value of old information in later targeted-contact attempts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Organisations should use confirmed communication channels, two-person payment approval, and a callback rule for change requests in sales and procurement work. Staff should learn to recognise fake offers, lookalike domains, and phone-based redirection attempts. Reviewing which public contact details are truly necessary and reducing unnecessary records limits potential impact even when a claim remains unverified.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Check and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The check on this page helps assess a possible connection between an email address or contact detail and the Speedio 2024 claim. A match does not establish that the material belongs to the company, that every field is present for the same person, or that an account was compromised. When a match appears, first review the security of related communication accounts and then the safeguards used against suspicious messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Priorities can follow the reported fields: account and recovery security for email, screening of fraudulent calls and messages for phone numbers, and verification of unexpected deliveries or correspondence for physical addresses. Unless new reliable evidence emerges, the origin, company responsibility, and technical method should not be treated as settled fact. Protective actions are intended to reduce risk without creating unnecessary alarm while uncertainty remains.\u003C\u002Fp>","","Speedio 2024 Alleged Data Exposure (27.5 Million Email Identifiers)","Speedio 2024 Alleged Data Exposure. 27.5 Million email identifiers were reported. Reported data: Company names, Email addresses, Phone numbers. Review the…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fspeedio_com_br.webp",false,{"name":7,"sector":35,"country":36,"website":10,"websiteArchiveUrl":29,"websiteStatus":29,"websiteCheckedAt":20},"B2B Lead Generation \u002F Business Data","Brazil"]