[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f3i7emtq0qwqir":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"modifiedDate":11,"contentUpdatedAt":12,"source":13,"sourceUrl":14,"sourceUrls":15,"pwnCount":16,"affectedCount":16,"affectedCountStatus":17,"affectedCountLowerBound":18,"affectedCountUnit":19,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":20,"dataClasses":21,"description":23,"seoTitle":14,"seoTitleEn":24,"seoDescription":14,"seoDescriptionEn":25,"logoUrl":26,"isVerified":4,"isSensitive":4,"isSpamList":27,"isMalware":27,"company":28},"68e3266eda11adda48825384","spyic","Spyic Data Breach","spyic.com","2025-02-14T00:00:00.000Z","2025-02-20T23:12:38.000Z","2026-07-18T23:58:19.224Z","Third party breach","",[],875999,"known",null,"unknown","High",[22],"Email addresses","\u003Cp>The Spyic data breach is a security incident recorded in February 2025 that affected approximately 876,000 accounts. In the context of phone monitoring software, the verified data field in this incident is customer email addresses. This record addresses in a clear manner the number of accounts affected, the scope of the incident, which data fields were listed, and which steps users should prioritize.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Due to the nature of monitoring software, even if only an email address is listed, the privacy impact of the incident is high; in such services, the context of the customer or target person can have sensitive consequences. Only verifiable types of data have been used in the explanation; unverified claims or additional claims that could be confused with the same name have not been presented as data. This way, the user can clearly see both the severity of the incident and the applicable security measures for their personal account.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Leaking Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The types of data listed in this incident are as follows: email addresses. Associating an email address with a tracking software subscription can affect the user's privacy and may be used for targeted social engineering. The presence of these fields together may pose a higher risk than an email leak alone, because attackers can combine communication, identity, location, shopping, or account access signals belonging to the same person to create more convincing phishing attempts.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>In this record, passwords, messages, photos, or call records are not listed as a data class; however, the risk of unauthorized access to content collected from phones in the context of the incident has also been reported. Users should particularly take into account fraud attempts that match passwords they use on different services with the same email address, phone numbers, and address information. Even if there are no passwords in the leak, fields such as email, phone, full name, or physical address are valuable in terms of targeted advertising, social engineering, fake notifications, and account recovery abuse.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The record is limited to customer email addresses associated with the Spyic domain and covers approximately 876 thousand unique accounts. Therefore, we keep the record restricted to the available data fields without expanding it as a definitive company statement. The incident is confirmed and is classified as a sensitive record. The scope limit is important: no unnecessary alarm is given to the user for data types not listed, but the combined impact of the listed fields should not be underestimated.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The data field has been maintained specifically as an email address; unverified additional content has not been presented as a data class. In areas where there is a possibility of duplicate or incorrect attribution, the title, domain name, country, and sector information have been checked separately. Different platforms with similar names or different services operating in the same sector have not been merged under this record as a single incident.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Individuals who open a Spyic account, email addresses that can be associated with the use of monitoring software, and the target individuals who may be indirectly affected by such services are at risk. The most significant risk for people in this group is that the leaked fields can be linked to daily account security. If a user uses the same email address for different shopping, gaming, community, dating, work, or financial services, attackers can use this information to prepare messages that appear to come from the real service.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The context of surveillance software can pave the way for much more sensitive social engineering scenarios, such as threats, blackmail, humiliation, fake support messages, or malicious installation instructions. Email addresses with a corporate domain can also become vulnerable to targeting of work accounts. For individual users, fields such as phone number, address, date of birth, profile photo, purchase, or device information can lead to consequences like account takeover, phishing, harassment, unauthorized tracking, and reputation risk.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Affected users should check the security of their email accounts, review sensitive services opened with the same email address, and take suspicious login notifications seriously. For records containing passwords or password-like fields, users should change all accounts where they use the same or similar password, use strong and unique passwords, and enable multi-factor authentication wherever possible. For records without listed passwords, unexpected verification codes, links, and attachments received via email and phone should be evaluated more carefully.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>In records containing address, date of birth, official identification, profile photo, or location information, users should update identity verification questions, review account recovery options, and monitor for fake profiles representing themselves. Corporate users should share with the security team whether these fields are being used for employee targeting.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Using separate email accounts for services with high privacy impact, regularly cleaning account history, and checking for unknown tracking applications on phones provides long-term protection. In the long term, unique passwords for each account, a password manager, multi-factor authentication, regular session checks, and closing old accounts form the basic security baseline. The fact that an email address has been involved in different incidents before implies an accumulation of risk that is not limited to a single registration.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>After such incidents, it may not be sufficient for users to only change the password on the relevant platform. If the same phone number, the same delivery address, the same username, or the same recovery email is used on other services as well, attackers can try different accounts based on these common points. Therefore, making an inventory of accounts and cleaning up old memberships provides a permanent defense.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>If the user sees a match with this record, they should check forwarding, recovery address, and active session controls in their email account; they should also assess whether there are signs of unauthorized monitoring on their phone. This record is prepared to directly show the user which areas are at risk. If a match is seen, the first step is not to panic; it is to separate passwords, log out of sessions, review security notifications, and check for suspicious logins.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Final assessment: This record contains only the email address as a data field; however, it has been considered sensitive due to the tracking software context. The user should compare the list of fields on this page with their account history and take immediate action on services where the same email-password combination is reused. Suspicious messages, unexpected calls, or account recovery notifications should be addressed with higher priority after the incident.\u003C\u002Fp>","Spyic Data Breach (876 Thousand Reported Records)","Spyic Data Breach. 876 Thousand reported records were reported. Reported data: Email addresses. Review the scope, risks, and protective steps.","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fspyic_com.webp",false,{"name":29,"sector":30,"country":31,"website":9,"websiteArchiveUrl":14,"websiteStatus":14,"websiteCheckedAt":18},"Spyic","Monitoring Software \u002F Spyware","Global"]