[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f2zc2lcgqwvojm":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":7,"domain":9,"breachDate":10,"addedDate":11,"publishedAt":12,"modifiedDate":13,"contentUpdatedAt":14,"source":15,"sourceUrl":16,"sourceUrls":17,"pwnCount":19,"affectedCount":19,"affectedCountStatus":20,"affectedCountLowerBound":12,"affectedCountUnit":21,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"contentLocale":22,"availableLocales":23,"translations":25,"severity":28,"dataClasses":29,"description":34,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":36,"logoUrl":37,"isVerified":38,"isSensitive":38,"isSpamList":38,"isMalware":38,"company":39},"6a45ac34bac8984568ce5f4b","ukscrappers","UKScrappers Alleged Data Exposure","ukscrappers.co.uk","2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z","2026-07-02T00:09:24.614Z",null,"2026-09-17T16:27:41.515Z","2026-07-19T00:07:00.466Z","Third party breach","https:\u002F\u002Fleakcheck.io\u002Fdata-breaches\u002Fukscrappers-co-uk",[16,18],"https:\u002F\u002F9ghz.com\u002Fdata-breaches\u002Fukscrappers-co-uk",47296,"known","email_identifiers","en",[22,24],"tr",{"en":26,"tr":27},{"slug":7},{"slug":7},"Medium",[30,31,32,33],"Email addresses","Usernames","IP addresses","Passwords","\u003Cp>The UKScrappers data breach is a security incident examined within the craft and scrapbooking forum community associated with the domain www.ukscrappers.co.uk, and dates back to January 2021. This record has been included because it is supported as a single incident affecting 47,296 accounts in records seen in open breach inventories. Only the fields for email addresses, usernames, IP addresses, and password hashes were retained in the record; unsupported data types were omitted to avoid misleading the user.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Leaking Data Types and Risks\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Before the UKScrappers registration was opened, matches in title, domain name, similar brand name, event date, and number of registrations were checked in existing records. Since no record representing the same event was found, it was kept as a separate record. Records with similar names but different domains or different events were excluded from this decision.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Small differences may be seen between the number of records in the target lists and the number of details that can be verified. This could be due to differences in raw rows, unique accounts, duplicate emails, cleaned records, or repackaged data sets. On this page, the value of 47,296, which is consistently supported along with the data types, is taken as the basis, not the highest number seen.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Since the UKScrappers incident concerns a hobby and forum community, the username, IP address, and email matching should be evaluated together. Because hobby forums can remain active for many years, old profiles can provide context about a person's digital history.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Verified Scope and Boundaries\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>In this incident, password hashes, usernames, and IP addresses were supported together. The IP address can provide clues about rough location or connection habits; the username can help match the same person with their profiles on other forums.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In the UKScrappers incident, the risk is higher than an ordinary email leak because MD5-based hash password information was found. Password data reduces attackers' trial-and-error time, facilitates automatic login attempts on other services where the same password is used, and makes password reset messages more convincing.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>User Groups at Risk\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Although an email address alone may seem like a limited personal data, it turns into a strong attack vector when combined with a username, IP address, password, or profile information. If the user uses the same email address for work, shopping, forums, games, financial, or social media accounts, the impact can extend beyond the relevant platform.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Even if this event is from the past, its security value continues. A significant portion of users reuse old password patterns with small changes. Therefore, an old breach like UKScrappers can be used years later for password guessing, credential stuffing, and targeted phishing attempts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The first step for users is to recall which email address and password they may have used in the past on UKScrappers or www.ukscrappers.co.uk. If the same password family was used on other accounts, it is not sufficient to only change it on the relevant site; all reused passwords must be replaced with unique and random passwords.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Using a password manager is one of the most effective measures that can be taken after this incident. Creating a separate password for each site prevents a single breach from spreading to other accounts in a chain. Old passwords saved in the browser should also be reviewed, and weak or repeated passwords should be cleaned up.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Two-factor authentication is prioritized especially for email accounts, password managers, financial accounts, social media profiles, gaming accounts, and admin panels. App-based authentication or hardware security keys provide more resilient protection compared to SMS-based authentication.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Email account forwarding rules, recovery addresses, connected apps, trusted device list, and recent sessions should be checked. Even if an attacker cannot directly access the UKScrappers account, they may target password reset flows of other services through the email account.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In phishing risk, the old service name, username, sector information, or registration date may be used. Users should type the address themselves instead of clicking on incoming links directly, not open file attachments without verification, and should be cautious of messages that create urgency for immediate action.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Risk should also be assessed for corporate users. If an employee used their work email on an account that appears to be personal, it is possible to try the same password on company systems. Domain-based security scans, multi-factor authentication, and controls that catch password reuse are therefore important.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>From the perspective of site owners, the main lesson is password storage and data minimization. Plain text or quickly crackable hash formats directly weaken user security. In modern systems, strong, salted, and slow password derivation methods should be used, and old hash formats should be gradually updated during user login.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Backups, test environments, export files, old forum software, admin panels, and unnecessary privileges should be regularly audited. Many data leaks originate not from the visible part of the main application, but from forgotten auxiliary systems or accounts with extensive privileges.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In institutions without an incident response plan, user notification, password reset, log review, and connected system checks are delayed. Which systems will be monitored, which records will be kept, which users will be informed, and which backups will be reviewed should be predefined.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Although a higher number appeared on the target list for UKScrappers, verifiable open detail supported 47,296 records. Therefore, cleaned and supported values along with data types were used on the page.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In scrapbooking and craft communities, users may have shared real names, city, workshop information, or social profile links. These fields were not added to the record because they are not directly supported as a data class, but it is recommended that users review their older profiles.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>When forum software is not kept up to date, old hash algorithms and plugins can pose risks for a long time. Therefore, forum owners should regularly check password algorithms, the plugin list, backup directories, and administrator accounts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Urgent Measures to Be Taken\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Since the UKScrappers website timed out during the latest check, users' direct access to their accounts may be disrupted. This situation does not make reusing old passwords irrelevant; if the same email and password exist on other accounts, they must be changed.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Since a reliable logo could not be obtained from the live site for UKScrappers, a simple local SVG logo was kept. This way, the registration page remains accessible within the registration service without visual errors.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In this record, unverified data types were specifically left out. Rather than creating a longer list of data classes, clearly showing the supported fields is more valuable for user confidence. On data breach pages, the aim is not to look intimidating, but to clearly explain the correct scope and applicable security measures.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>This page was prepared to provide straightforward, Turkish, and practical information under various names such as UKScrappers data breach, www.ukscrappers.co.uk data leak, UKScrappers password leak, and UKScrappers user data. The text explains verified areas and practical security steps.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>When users see this record, they should evaluate not only the account on the relevant platform but also other accounts they have opened with the same email address. Accounts where old passwords are reused are particularly the first target for attackers. Closing old accounts also provides long-term risk reduction.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>To reduce password reuse, new passwords should not include brand names, birth years, usernames, team names, hobbies, cities, or easily guessed additions. Adding a small number or special character to the end of a password does not make it secure; attacker tools try these patterns quickly.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The account security checklist is clear: change the old password, update all accounts using the same password, enable two-factor authentication, check email recovery information, close unknown sessions, and use the site address directly instead of links in suspicious messages.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Security teams should evaluate this record in terms of email addresses that match employee domain names. Corporate email addresses used in old forum, shopping, financial, or community accounts can enrich attackers' target lists.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Long-Term Security Strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Data minimization is critical in such incidents. Unnecessary profile fields should not be collected, inactive accounts should be cleared with reasonable retention policies, access to sensitive fields should be restricted, and data export operations should be additionally monitored.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Instead of panicking, users need to complete account hygiene. Closing old and forgotten accounts, deleting unnecessary memberships, updating recovery addresses, and enabling login notifications on important accounts provide permanent protection.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The risk level on this page was determined as critical, taking into account the number of affected accounts, the type of password information, the potential of data classes for account takeover, and whether the incident involved reusable credentials. The critical level does not indicate definite misuse but signifies that the user needs to take quick action.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>As a result, for UKScrappers, this record is a single data breach entry affecting 47,296 accounts during the January 2021 period, including fields such as email addresses, usernames, IP addresses, and password hashes. Users are advised to use unique passwords, enable two-step verification, check email security settings, and monitor suspicious login alerts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Since in the UKScrappers record the numerical value, title, and domain are evaluated together, ambiguous list fragments circulating under the same name were not transferred to this page. The record seen by the user is limited to the verified domain and the event period.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Keeping data classes simple is particularly important; because adding unsupported fields disrupts the user's risk assessment. Therefore, claims other than email addresses, usernames, IP addresses, and password hashes are not presented as proven data fields for this record.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Old memberships associated with the www.ukscrappers.co.uk domain may have been forgotten. If password changes cannot be made on forgotten accounts, a more realistic priority is to find other services where the same password is used and secure those.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>When a username or email address is combined with other leaks, it becomes easier for attackers to guess a person's interests, country, industry, or past membership habits. Therefore, even if a single breach seems small, the combined risk is greater.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>From the perspective of institutions, the use of work email in employees' personal memberships should be addressed in regular awareness trainings. Such records provide a warning signal to measure password reuse and the visibility of corporate identities on personal platforms.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Record Control and User Action\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>If the user sees their own email in this record, they should start with the most important accounts first: email inbox, bank or investment account, password manager, cloud storage, social media, and frequently used shopping accounts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>If account closure is possible, closing unnecessary old memberships is also a good step. For accounts that cannot be closed, at least the password should be made unique, profile information should be minimized, and login notifications should be enabled.\u003C\u002Fp>","UKScrappers Alleged Data Exposure (47.3 Thousand Email Identifiers)","UKScrappers Alleged Data Exposure. 47.3 Thousand email identifiers are reported. Reported data: Email addresses, Usernames, IP addresses. Review the scope…","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Fukscrappers.svg",false,{"name":40,"sector":41,"country":42,"website":43,"websiteArchiveUrl":44,"websiteStatus":44,"websiteCheckedAt":12},"UKScrappers","Crafting Forum \u002F Scrapbooking Community","United Kingdom","www.ukscrappers.co.uk",""]