[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fsNGgo7H6H2hjJuZuBbMWkATK9zDlzvn-xPxbklwRbxI":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"company":11,"breachDate":15,"addedDate":16,"modifiedDate":16,"pwnCount":17,"totalRecords":18,"dataClasses":19,"description":26,"source":27,"isVerified":4,"isSpamList":28,"isSensitive":4,"processingStatus":29,"logoUrl":30,"contentUpdatedAt":16,"hasEnglishDescription":4,"severity":31},"6a67269e8d84208504fbc801","EasyPak2026","Easypak 2026 Data Breach","easypak-2026","easypak.com",{"name":12,"sector":13,"country":14,"website":10},"G-Pak Holdings LLC dba Easypak","Other","United States","2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z","2026-07-27T09:36:30.664Z",0,null,[20,21,22,23,24,25],"Personal information","First and last names","Social Security numbers","Driver's license information","Financial account information","Medical records","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>The Easypak 2026 data breach\u003C\u002Fstrong> was an unauthorized-access incident involving the computer network of thermoformed plastic packaging manufacturer G-Pak Holdings LLC. Easypak became aware of the access on or about January 13, 2026; a review with outside cybersecurity specialists found June 8 that certain files containing personal information may have been accessed without authorization.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The official sample letter filed in Massachusetts describes the affected fields as a full name and other recipient-dependent personal information. A source-linked secondary regulatory summary reports names, Social Security numbers, driver's-license information, financial-account data, and medical-record categories. At least 217 Massachusetts residents were affected, but no deduplicated nationwide total was published.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How Was the Easypak Breach Confirmed?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The primary source is G-Pak Holdings LLC dba Easypak's official “Important Information” letter in the Massachusetts consumer-notification archive. It directly describes the January 13 discovery, system-security measures, investigation with outside specialists, June 8 data-review result, complimentary credit monitoring, and the dedicated assistance line at 978-537-5683 extension 1003.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Claim Depot links the official filing to Easypak's company profile and summarizes at least 217 Massachusetts residents plus reported identity, financial, and medical data categories. It also reports that the Akira ransomware group claimed January 29 to have taken 67 GB of data. Easypak's public letter confirms neither the group name, ransomware, nor the 67 GB amount, so LeakData keeps those elements clearly attributed to the actor claim.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>What Happened Between January 13 and June 8, 2026?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Easypak became aware of unauthorized access to its computer network on or about January 13. The organization took steps to secure its systems and worked with experienced external cybersecurity professionals to determine the event's full extent and the scope of impacted data. On June 8, the investigation found that certain files containing personal information may have been subject to unauthorized access on January 13.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The official letter does not disclose the initial-access route, exact duration, whether data exfiltration was confirmed, actor identity, or whether systems were encrypted. The Akira and 67 GB statements in the secondary source are attributed to the threat actor rather than Easypak. The verified entry is therefore limited to unauthorized network access and possible file access; ransomware attribution is not presented as an established fact.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>What Personal Information Was Affected?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The official sample letter says the impacted files contained the recipient's full name and another PII field populated separately for that person. The source-linked regulatory summary identifies the variable categories as Social Security numbers, driver's-license information, financial-account information, and medical records. Readers must not assume all categories occurred together for every recipient; the individual letter is the authoritative field list.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The public material does not separately confirm email addresses, passwords, password hashes, usernames, bank names, routing numbers, balances, payment cards, CVVs, PINs, diagnoses, treatments, prescriptions, policy numbers, or medical-record numbers. “Financial account” and “medical records” are broad categories. Adding subfields absent from the sources would artificially enlarge the stated risk.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>What Is the Risk From Identity, Financial, and Medical Data?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>A name combined with an SSN or driver's-license detail may support new-account fraud, tax-identity misuse, or targeted requests framed as identity verification. A recipient whose notice lists financial-account information should watch for unfamiliar transactions, new payees, or contact-detail changes. A category appearing in the event-level list does not prove that every person had it or that misuse occurred.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>A medical-record category may make fake provider calls or billing messages more convincing. A recipient should verify unfamiliar services, providers, or changes in an explanation of benefits or patient portal directly with the relevant institution. Unexpected contacts claiming to represent Easypak, a monitoring provider, or a healthcare organization should not receive a full SSN, account detail, or one-time code.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How Did Easypak Respond?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Easypak said it secured its systems, conducted a thorough review with outside cybersecurity professionals, and continued evaluating and improving its security and privacy controls. As of the letter, it had no evidence that personal information was used for financial fraud or identity theft. That finding is time-limited and is not a guarantee against later misuse.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The organization offered complimentary credit monitoring and provided instructions for fraud alerts, credit freezes, and free credit reports. Its dedicated line is available for 90 days from the date of each letter, weekdays from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern Time. General SSN and medical-identity guidance in the appendix is precautionary and does not prove that each recipient had every category.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How Many People Were Affected and What Should Recipients Do?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Regulatory sources establish at least 217 affected Massachusetts residents but do not disclose the nationwide total. The figure is therefore a verified lower bound; Easypak's workforce, customer, or supplier population must not be substituted for a victim count. LeakData holds no raw incident files or searchable person data for this event and publishes only verified incident metadata.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>A recipient should first identify the exact fields named in the individual letter. If an SSN or driver's-license detail is listed, consider a credit freeze and fraud alert; if financial-account information is listed, monitor the institution and discuss whether an account change is appropriate. Review unfamiliar medical services when relevant. People who received no notice should not assume they were affected solely from the public entry, and the Akira claim should not be treated as Easypak-confirmed attribution.\u003C\u002Fp>","Official Massachusetts filing confirming unauthorized Easypak network access and possible access to files containing personal information",false,"completed","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Feasypak_com.png","Low"]