[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fj6wozJ0yCoJSSLHnAYSzqZFbIhzSnR1GryckrseCDCE":3},{"success":4,"breach":5},true,{"_id":6,"name":7,"title":8,"slug":9,"domain":10,"company":11,"breachDate":15,"addedDate":16,"modifiedDate":17,"pwnCount":18,"totalRecords":19,"dataClasses":20,"description":47,"source":48,"isVerified":4,"isSpamList":49,"isSensitive":4,"severity":50,"processingStatus":51,"logoUrl":52,"contentUpdatedAt":16,"hasEnglishDescription":4},"6a671eb05182c5523ef7f237","LittleFlowerChildrenFamilyServices2026","Little Flower Children and Family Services 2026 Data Breach","little-flower-children-family-services-2026","littleflowerny.org",{"name":12,"sector":13,"country":14,"website":10},"Little Flower Children and Family Services","Healthcare and Social Services","United States","2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z","2026-07-27T09:02:40.645Z","2026-07-27T09:30:00.000Z",0,null,[21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46],"Personal information","Protected health information","Names","Addresses","Phone numbers","Email addresses","Social Security numbers","Driver's license numbers","State identification numbers","Taxpayer identification numbers","Passport numbers","Financial account information","Payment card information","Digital signatures","Biometric data","Dates of birth","Medical treatment or diagnosis information","Prescription information","Dates of service","Patient identification numbers","Provider names","Patient account numbers","Medical record numbers","Medicare or Medicaid numbers","Health insurance information","Treatment cost information","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>The Little Flower Children and Family Services 2026 data breach\u003C\u002Fstrong> occurred in the network of a New York nonprofit serving children, families, and adults with developmental disabilities. Little Flower discovered unusual activity March 20, 2026. Its investigation found unauthorized access to certain information on the network from March 12 through March 20.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Possible data included names, contact details, SSNs, government IDs, tax IDs, passports, financial accounts, payment cards, digital signatures, biometric data, and birth dates, together with broad medical, prescription, insurance, and patient-account fields. Review remained underway at public notice. No national total was disclosed, so pwnCount and totalRecords are zero, and importedRecordCount is zero.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How Was the Little Flower Breach Confirmed?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The primary source is Little Flower's “Notice of Data Incident” PDF dated May 19, 2026 on its corporate domain. The document explains discovery, the March 12–20 access period, ongoing data review, possible information categories, password resets, law-enforcement notification, complimentary protection service, and assistance line.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Claim Depot connects the official PDF with the organization profile and independently summarizes the timeline and broad data scope. The two sources align on the access window, ongoing review, and data fields. LeakData does not elevate secondary categorization over the organization text and does not claim every person had the same combination of information.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>What Happened From March 12 Through March 20, 2026?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Little Flower detected unusual network activity March 20 and immediately opened an investigation. The review found that an unauthorized party accessed certain information stored on the network from March 12 through March 20. The organization said it was conducting a comprehensive review to identify the types of information in the affected content and the people to whom it related.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The public notice does not identify the initial access vector, actor, malware, ransom demand, download of files, or publication of data. Confirmed access establishes the genuine event but does not prove that every field was copied. Because review remained underway, the possible category list represents the broad incident-wide scope; person-specific results may be narrower.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>What Identity, Financial, and Biometric Data Was Affected?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Possible identity and contact fields were names, addresses, telephone numbers, emails, Social Security numbers, driver's-license or state-ID numbers, taxpayer IDs, passport numbers, and dates of birth. Financial-account information, payment-card information, digital signatures, and biometric data may also have been present. Combining persistent and authentication-related fields creates long-term identity risk.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Recipients should monitor bank and card activity and report unfamiliar transactions or profile changes. When an SSN or government ID was involved, a credit freeze, fraud alert, and IRS Identity Protection PIN may be appropriate. Because the biometric type is not disclosed, LeakData does not assume a particular technology such as a fingerprint, facial template, or voiceprint.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>What Medical and Prescription Information Was in Scope?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Medical fields could include treatment or diagnosis information, prescription information, dates of service, patient-identification numbers, provider names, patient-account numbers, and medical-record numbers. These can expose care relationships, clinical conditions, and service history. Context involving children and people with developmental disabilities may increase privacy harm and the effectiveness of targeted fraud.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Individuals should review patient portals, provider accounts, and prescription history for visits, medications, diagnoses, messages, or contact changes they do not recognize. Medical details, passwords, and one-time codes should not be shared in unexpected calls. The source does not separately confirm laboratory results, images, therapy notes, or dosage information, so LeakData does not add them.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How Were Medicare, Medicaid, and Insurance Data Affected?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Possible data included Medicare or Medicaid numbers, health-insurance information, and treatment-cost information. Although the text does not separately list insurance-card, policy, or claim numbers, the broad health-insurance category may expose a plan relationship. Together with patient-account numbers and treatment costs, the data can support fraudulent billing or explanation-of-benefits-themed social engineering.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Recipients should review explanation-of-benefits statements for services, providers, costs, or claims they do not recognize and verify suspicious entries directly with the provider or plan. Unexpected payment demands claiming to come from Little Flower or a public health program should be checked through an independent official number. Because review remained active, a personal letter may provide more precise scope than the public list.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How Many People Were Affected and How Did Little Flower Respond?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Little Flower and the source-linked summary do not publish a deduplicated nationwide population. LeakData does not convert the population served, network file count, or broad category list into a victim figure; pwnCount and totalRecords are zero. importedRecordCount is also zero because no patient, employee, or customer rows were obtained.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The organization reset passwords, notified law enforcement, reviewed policies and procedures, and offered potentially affected people complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection. The 1-877-429-9806 center is available weekdays from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET. Users should enroll only through official notice instructions and monitor investigation updates. LeakData does not host incident files or personal records.\u003C\u002Fp>","Official Little Flower notice confirming unauthorized network access and possible exposure of extensive identity, financial, biometric, and health data",false,"Low","completed","\u002Fuploads\u002Flogo\u002Flittleflowerny_org.svg"]