All Breaches
December 1, 2024 Verified Sensitive Record Insurance / Financial services

Maxance 2024 Data Breach

The Maxance data breach is a high-impact personal data incident examined within the scope of insurance brokerage services based in France, associated with the domain name maxance.com, and dated to December 2024.

268.8 Thousand
Reported Records
8
Data Types
High
Severity
Oct 10, 2026
Last updated

Protect Yourself

Check whether you were affected by this breach

Check my email

Exposed Data Types

8
  • Email addresses
  • Names
  • Usernames
  • Phone numbers
  • Physical addresses
  • Genders
  • IBAN numbers
  • Vehicle information

About This Breach

This record was added because it is supported as a single event affecting 268,806 accounts. The record contained fields such as email addresses, names, usernames, phone numbers, physical addresses, gender information, IBAN details, and vehicle information; unsupported claims of payment cards, plaintext passwords, or official identification documents were left out to avoid misleading the user.

Leaking Data Types and Risks

In the verification assessment, the name Maxance, the domain name maxance.com, the insurance intermediary context, the time of December 2024, the number of affected accounts at 268,806, and the simultaneous support of data fields in the context of contact, IBAN, and vehicle were taken into account in the same incident. Records in the insurance sector should be evaluated more sensitively than general marketing lists of similar size, as they can show the context of policy, vehicle, contact, and address belonging to the same individual together. When creating a Maxance record, the domain name of the incident, brand name, number of records, country, sector, and data class matches were checked together.

Verified Scope and Boundaries

Maxance data breach is particularly important in terms of social engineering attacks themed around insurance quotes, claim notifications, vehicle policy renewals, contract updates, and customer service. An attacker can combine fields such as email, phone, address, IBAN, and vehicle information to create messages that resemble an insurance process the user really knows. Therefore, the risk is not limited to general phishing messages that arrive alone in the inbox; phone calls, text messages, fake policy renewal requests, and document upload links can also be affected by the same incident.

User Groups at Risk

In this incident, visible data classes show the communication, financial account, and vehicle and contract context related to the insurance service. Email address and phone number can be used to quickly contact the user, physical address and name fields to personalize the message, and vehicle and contract information to make the fraudulent transaction appear credible. Users need to be especially cautious about messages that force urgent decisions, such as claims files, premium differences, payment plans, policy cancellations, or vehicle changes. Therefore, the Maxance data breach record should be treated not only as an account search result but as a security warning that explains the financial and insurance-themed fraud risk.

People who have a Maxance account or other insurance and finance accounts used with the same email address should first check directly through known company channels without clicking on unexpected links. If the same password has been used on different services, even if the password field is not supported in this incident, it is advisable for overall account security to switch to a unique password scheme. Users are recommended to enable multi-factor authentication on their email accounts, verify documents or payment requests received by phone through an independent channel, and avoid making hasty decisions on messages prepared with personal information.

Urgent Measures to Be Taken

From the perspective of institutions, a Maxance data breach increases the need for additional verification in customer support, policy management, call center, and claim reporting processes. Conducting transactions using just the name, phone number, address, or vehicle information becomes risky, as these fields can be misused together. Customer representatives need to use stronger verification for operations such as account changes, updating contact information, payment instructions, or document requests. Additionally, it should be clearly indicated which channels are official for user communications, and it should be easy to find out how to report suspicious messages.

Long-Term Security Strategies

For users searching for Maxance data breaches, the most important issue is to correctly understand the supported scope of the record. This record highlights personal communication, address, contract, and vehicle context; unverified payment card or password claims are not included. Nevertheless, data aggregation is strong enough for persuasion scenarios specific to insurance customers. Therefore, the most practical steps to take when a Maxance data breach is observed are to strengthen email security, change similar passwords, verify insurance notifications directly through official channels, and be cautious about urgent requests involving personal information.

Record Control and User Action

The overall risk level has been assessed as high; because even if the event is not directly a financial product, the insurance relationship, vehicle information, contract context, and communication data affect user security. The Maxance data breach record was kept under a unique brand and domain name to avoid confusion with other events with the same or similar names. Instead of exaggerated data types that could mislead the user, the supported fields were written; the aim is to provide direct answers to the questions of the person searching: what is the Maxance data breach, which information might have been affected, and what security steps should be taken.

The presence of IBAN information in Maxance records elevates this incident to a level more sensitive than mere visibility of contact data. An IBAN alone does not mean a card number or transaction authorization; however, when used together with name, phone, address, and vehicle information, it can make fraudulent payment requests, policy refunds, damage payments, or bank update scenarios more convincing. Therefore, users should verify all messages containing bank information only through known channels.

Verification and editorial method

LeakData compares the incident name, date, affected-record count, and exposed data types with accessible sources. Unverified fields are not presented as facts, and records are updated when new evidence becomes available.

Report missing or incorrect information